These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Audiometric configurations of hearing impaired children in Hong Kong: implications for amplification. Yuen KC; McPherson B Disabil Rehabil; 2002 Nov; 24(17):904-13. PubMed ID: 12519486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The value of brain-stem audiometry in the selection of hearing aids]. Kiessling J Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1984 Feb; 63(2):88-91. PubMed ID: 6700342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram. Halpin C; Rauch SD Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [A simple audiometry test of speech intelligibility in background noise]. Garin P; Galle C Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2002; 123(4):219-24. PubMed ID: 12723485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the "snap" abutment. Verstraeten N; Zarowski AJ; Somers T; Riff D; Offeciers EF Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 18957902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of a protocol for fitting a wearable master hearing aid. Collins MJ; Levitt H Bull Prosthet Res; 1981; 10-35():35-40. PubMed ID: 7332830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation. Priwin C; Stenfelt S; Granström G; Tjellström A; Håkansson B Laryngoscope; 2004 Jan; 114(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 14709999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The bone-anchored hearing aid: principal design and audiometric results. Håkansson BE; Carlsson PU; Tjellström A; Lidén G Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Sep; 73(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7988397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Effect of a hearing aid on progressive hearing loss]. Azema B; Virole B; Huyghe B; Chapuy P; Avan P; Degove F; Renglet T; Paulissen D; Lagadec S Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1994; 111(5):239-47. PubMed ID: 7755301 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Measurement of hearing in dogs by respiration audiometry. Bradford LJ; McKinley JH; Rousey CL; Klein DE Am J Vet Res; 1973 Sep; 34(9):1183-7. PubMed ID: 4747040 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Audiometric tests for the prognostic evaluation of hearing-improving surgical interventions]. von Schulthess G; Baumgartner E Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1970; 32(2):90-9. PubMed ID: 5426131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [THE AUDIOMETRIC EXAMINATION AND INDICATION FOR A HEARING AID]. AUBRY M; PIALOUX P; PIMONOW L; LUCAS A Presse Med (1893); 1964 Jul; 72():2065-6. PubMed ID: 14163738 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The use of audiometry in the fitting of hearing aids for children (author's transl)]. Esser G; Schunicht R HNO; 1973 Dec; 21(12):369-72. PubMed ID: 4786010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of degree of hearing loss on diagnostic audiometric tests. Hayes D Am J Otol; 1980 Oct; 2(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 7212044 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]