These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Audiometric monitoring may reduce hearing loss, compensation awards. Sawyer C Occup Health Saf; 1989 Jan; 58(1):50-2. PubMed ID: 2522170 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Noise dosimeter for assessment of the risk of hearing loss in the work environment]. Merluzzi F Med Lav; 1975; 66(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 1134437 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Noise exposure and hearing conservation practices in an industry with high incidence of workers' compensation claims for hearing loss. Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Stebbins JG; Seixas NS; Morgan MS Am J Ind Med; 2002 Oct; 42(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 12271478 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [RĂ´le of otorhinolaryngology in legislation for the protection of workers subjected to noise]. Ledoux A Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 5120995 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Occupational hearing loss. May JJ Am J Ind Med; 2000 Jan; 37(1):112-20. PubMed ID: 10573600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [The state of Belgian legislation relevant to protection of work sites and workers from noise]. Uytdenhoef A Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):148-53. PubMed ID: 5120979 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Noise-induced hearing loss. Use of advanced audiological tests. Wilmot TJ Proc R Soc Med; 1971 Feb; 64(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 4251360 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Noise control and hearing conservation in large steam-electric generating stations. Stone GF; Freman TW; Craig RL Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1971 Feb; 32(2):123-30. PubMed ID: 5572568 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Hardness of hearing due to noise and noise deafness]. Mehmke S Med Welt; 1967 Jul; 27():1595-601. PubMed ID: 4239497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Hearing conservation in industry. Dobie RA West J Med; 1982 Dec; 137(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 7164430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Costs of workers' compensation claims for hearing loss. Alleyne BC; Dufresne RM; Kanji N; Reesal MR J Occup Med; 1989 Feb; 31(2):134-8. PubMed ID: 2523474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Industrial noise: evaluation of its danger and individual protection]. Wisner A Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):155-67. PubMed ID: 5120980 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [A synthesis of Italian legislation on noise prevention and damage]. Faleg G Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):139-41. PubMed ID: 5120977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers. Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Permissible limits of noise]. Chocholle R Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1971; 25(1):181-5. PubMed ID: 5120983 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Industrial hearing loss. Conservation and compensation aspects. Fox MS Occup Health Nurs; 1969 May; 17(5):18-24. PubMed ID: 4238395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Application of standards for hearing monitoring and protection to occupational noise exposed people]. Jia L; Cheng L; Zhao CS Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2004 Jun; 22(3):235-6. PubMed ID: 15256173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]