101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4261360)
1. Noise-exposure: the legal viewpoint.
Fredrikson HM
Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1971; 75(6):1272-82. PubMed ID: 4261360
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Industrial hearing loss. Conservation and compensation aspects.
Fox MS
Occup Health Nurs; 1969 May; 17(5):18-24. PubMed ID: 4238395
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Noise enforcement and worker's compensation claims.
Ginnold RE
Occup Health Saf; 1980 Sep; 49(8):64-7. PubMed ID: 6447851
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Hardness of hearing due to noise and noise deafness].
Mehmke S
Med Welt; 1967 Jul; 27():1595-601. PubMed ID: 4239497
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Essentials of noise regulations.
Suter AH
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1979 Aug; 12(3):585-99. PubMed ID: 157458
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Occupational hearing loss and the Ontario Worker's Compensation Board (Part 1).
Fiorini M
Health Law Can; 1987; 7(4):109-17. PubMed ID: 10313733
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Noise exposure and hearing conservation practices in an industry with high incidence of workers' compensation claims for hearing loss.
Daniell WE; Swan SS; McDaniel MM; Stebbins JG; Seixas NS; Morgan MS
Am J Ind Med; 2002 Oct; 42(4):309-17. PubMed ID: 12271478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noise-induced deafness.
Med J Aust; 1971 Oct; 2(18):878-80. PubMed ID: 4256507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of hearing conservation programs on incidence of noise-induced hearing loss in Canadian workers.
Davies H; Marion S; Teschke K
Am J Ind Med; 2008 Dec; 51(12):923-31. PubMed ID: 18726988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Occupational hearing loss: legal considerations.
Stander I
Ear Nose Throat J; 1980 Jun; 59(6):265-72 passim. PubMed ID: 6447061
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Legal aspect of medico-social problems raised by valid work laws].
Giet L
Rev Med Liege; 1971 Sep; 26(18):601-3. PubMed ID: 4256652
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Increased reporting of occupational hearing loss: workers' compensation in Washington State, 1984-1998.
Daniell WE; Fulton-Kehoe D; Cohen M; Swan SS; Franklin GM
Am J Ind Med; 2002 Dec; 42(6):502-10. PubMed ID: 12439873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Acoustic trauma in flight personnel. Medico-legal aspects].
Guelfo C
Minerva Med; 1973 Mar; 64(18):915-20. PubMed ID: 4267388
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Noise-induced hearing loss: the sixth question.
Busis SN
Am J Otol; 1991 Mar; 12(2):81-2. PubMed ID: 1828939
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Noise and hearing loss compensation.
Acton WI; Grime RP
Ann Occup Hyg; 1980; 23(2):205-15. PubMed ID: 6449170
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Compensation claims for loss of hearing; impact of standards.
Frazier FE
Am Assoc Ind Nurses J; 1967 May; 15(5):17-9 passim. PubMed ID: 4225618
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Noise-induced hearing loss--factors affecting worker's decision to submit a disability claim].
Poshnoi L; Carel R
Harefuah; 2004 Feb; 143(2):106-9, 167. PubMed ID: 15143698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [The hearing disability of the noise-damaged and the industrial injury insurance].
Klockhoff I; Lidén G
Lakartidningen; 1974 Feb; 71(9):819-22. PubMed ID: 4274900
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Occupational noise-induced hearing loss: the first two cases compensated in India.
Murlidhar V; Kanhere V
Natl Med J India; 1998; 11(3):150. PubMed ID: 9707710
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Widened practice for compensation justified--temporary solutions must be possible to create].
Ahlmark A; Tunemalm L
Lakartidningen; 1974 Feb; 71(9):823. PubMed ID: 4274901
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
