These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4261695)

  • 1. [Frequency discrimination].
    Giaccai F
    JFORL J Fr Otorhinolaryngol Audiophonol Chir Maxillofac; 1972 Mar; 21(3):189-93. PubMed ID: 4261695
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [High tone span in bone conduction receivers].
    Siegl H; Prasch G
    Monatsschr Ohrenheilkd Laryngorhinol; 1971; 105(4):169-70. PubMed ID: 5114210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Effect of age on the discrimination ability of the ear].
    Hallermann W; Plath P
    HNO; 1971 Jan; 19(1):26-32. PubMed ID: 5546675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Changes of the frequency discrimination threshold in presence of a continuous controlateral sound].
    Madonia T; Lentini G; Raso D
    Clin Otorinolaringoiatr; 1968; 20(4):257-63. PubMed ID: 5746205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [A practical method to differentiate the sensations of hearing and feeling (auditory and vibration threshold) in the low-frequency range (author's transl)].
    Hülse M; Wisser R
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1981 Dec; 60(12):624-7. PubMed ID: 7345299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Speech, tonal, threshold audiometry and the study of ultrasonic perception in the diagnosis of syringomyelobulbia].
    Madzhidov NM; Agzamov SK; Kan L
    Zh Nevropatol Psikhiatr Im S S Korsakova; 1972; 72(12):1790-3. PubMed ID: 4661018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [A practical method for determination of the frequency discrimination threshold].
    Giaccai F; Cappellini F; Ricci T
    Boll Mal Orecch Gola Naso; 1970; 88(1):7-23. PubMed ID: 5515423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. SISI test in pre-operative mixed-loss patients.
    Pratt LL; Egan JJ
    Laryngoscope; 1968 Nov; 78(11):1965-70. PubMed ID: 5725324
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical application of intensity difference limen.
    Harbert F; Young IM; Weiss BG
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1969 Apr; 67(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 5371326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Music to electric ears: pitch and timbre perception by cochlear implant patients.
    Pressnitzer D; Bestel J; Fraysse B
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2005 Dec; 1060():343-5. PubMed ID: 16597784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Psychophysics of 12 channels implant.
    Chouard CH; Fugain C; Drira M; Alcaras N
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():105-10. PubMed ID: 6596832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of contralateral broad-band noise on frequency discrimination.
    Labiak JM; Wilson WR
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974; 77(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 4829051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of small changes in frequency on clinically determined estimates of auditory threshold.
    Woodford CM
    ASHA; 1984 Apr; 26(4):25-30. PubMed ID: 6732892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Comparative audiometric study of bone conduction and chondral conduction. Its importance in the diagnosis of endo- and retro-cochlear perception deafness].
    Pialoux P; Fontelle P; Chouard CH; Freyss G
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1974 Mar; 91(3):89-97. PubMed ID: 4848331
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of speech audiometry by bone conduction in hearing-impaired adults.
    Karlsen EA; Goetzinger CP
    J Aud Res; 1980 Apr; 20(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 7345063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interaction of competing speech signals with hearing losses.
    Carhart R; Tillman TW
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1970 Mar; 91(3):273-9. PubMed ID: 5414080
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination performance of high school sophomores on a battery of auditory tests.
    Elliott DN; Riach WD; Sheposh JP; Trahiotis C
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1966; ():Suppl 216:1-59. PubMed ID: 5935910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Studies of accurate cochlear reverse in otospongiosis. Value of the vocal Weber test.
    Causse J; Bel J; Michaux P; Canut Y; Tapon J
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1971; 88(10):569-80. PubMed ID: 5135216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lateralization of hearing loss and vestibular nystagmus in test pilots.
    Bruner A; Norris TW
    Aerosp Med; 1970 Jun; 41(6):684-7. PubMed ID: 5446928
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.