These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Preperitoneal abdominal wound repair: incidence of dehiscence. McFadden PM; Peacock EE Am J Surg; 1983 Feb; 145(2):213-4. PubMed ID: 6218761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mass closure versus layer closure of abdominal wound: a prospective clinical study. Chowdhury SK; Choudhury SD J Indian Med Assoc; 1994 Jul; 92(7):229-32. PubMed ID: 7963604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Sidewinder retention sutures for closure of the abdominal wall. Rappaport WD; Putnam C Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1989 Jul; 169(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 2525819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Lead disc sutures in ruptured abdomen]. König R Z Arztl Fortbild (Jena); 1970 Apr; 64(8):399-400. PubMed ID: 4255890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Sutures, incisions, and anastomoses. Everett WG Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Jul; 55(1):31-8. PubMed ID: 4276858 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Chopstick retention suture for the closure of abdominal wounds. Matsuoka J; Gohchi A; Kamikawa Y; Sakagami K; Orita K J Am Coll Surg; 1995 Nov; 181(5):471-4. PubMed ID: 7582219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Importance of mechanical factors in the development of abdomial wound dehiscence. Tensile strength of the human and animal fascia with regard to various suture-materials]. Tauber R; Seidel W Zentralbl Chir; 1975; 100(19):1178-82. PubMed ID: 132828 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Closure of abdominal wall defects by decorticated flap]. Hasman L Rozhl Chir; 1971 Nov; 50(11):590-4. PubMed ID: 4256210 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Measurements of the solidity of the sutures of the abdominal wall]. Seidel W; Tauber R; Hoffschulte KH Chirurg; 1974 Jun; 45(6):266-72. PubMed ID: 4277873 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. The superiority of polyglycolic acid sutures for closure of abdominal incisions. Gallitano AL; Kondi ES Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Nov; 137(5):794-6. PubMed ID: 4270499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A safe method of closure with retention sutures. Adams G; Richter RM; Levowitz BS Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1973 Jun; 136(6):981-2. PubMed ID: 4267371 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Wound strength in abdominal incisions: a comparison of two continuous mass closure techniques in rats. Meeks GR; Nelson KC; Byars RW Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Dec; 173(6):1676-82; discussion 1682-3. PubMed ID: 8610744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Novafil. A dynamic suture for wound closure. Rodeheaver GT; Nesbit WS; Edlich RF Ann Surg; 1986 Aug; 204(2):193-9. PubMed ID: 3017248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Surgical technique for closure of difficult abdomen. Abbasoglu O; Nursal T Acta Chir Belg; 2003 Jun; 103(3):340-1. PubMed ID: 12914378 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A new kind of "deep retention suture". Faxén A; Meurling S; Borkowski A Acta Chir Scand; 1976; 142(1):13-4. PubMed ID: 131461 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Negative side-effects of retention sutures for abdominal wound closure. A prospective randomised study. Rink AD; Goldschmidt D; Dietrich J; Nagelschmidt M; Vestweber KH Eur J Surg; 2000 Dec; 166(12):932-7. PubMed ID: 11152253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]