These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 426501)
1. Susceptibility of gram-negative aerobic bacilli resistant to carbenicillin in a general hospital to piperacillin and ticarcillin. McGowan JE; Terry PM Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Jan; 15(1):137-39. PubMed ID: 426501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ticarcillin: a collaborative in vitro comparison with carbenicillin against over 9,000 clinical bacterial isolates. Fuchs PC; Gavan TL; Gerlach EH; Jones RN; Barry AL; Thornsberry C Am J Med Sci; 1977; 274(3):255-63. PubMed ID: 610415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Susceptibility of the anaerobic bacteria, group D streptococci, Enterobacteriaceae, and Pseudomonas to semisynthetic penicillins: carbenicillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin. Monif GR; Clark PR; Shuster JJ; Baer H Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Nov; 14(5):643-9. PubMed ID: 103491 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Apalcillin: in vitro activity compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin against Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter]. Quentin C; Sageaux JC; Bebear C; Latrille J Pathol Biol (Paris); 1983 Jun; 31(6):463-6. PubMed ID: 6224123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity to carbenicillin and ticarcillin, and the beta-lactamases of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in the UK in 1978-79. King JD; Farmer T; Reading C; Sutherland R J Clin Pathol; 1980 Mar; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 6769973 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative in vitro antibacterial activity of seven semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic gram-negative bacteria and enterococci. Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P Infection; 1982; 10 Suppl 3():S249-56. PubMed ID: 7152690 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative in vitro activity of 5 semi-synthetic penicillins against aerobic Gram-negative bacilli and enterococci (author's transl)]. Thabaut A; Durosoir JL; Saliou P Nouv Presse Med; 1982 Feb; 11(5 Pt 2):318-23. PubMed ID: 6460967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison and evaluation of ticarcillin and carbenicillin using disk diffusion methods. Parry MF; Neu HC Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Apr; 9(4):625-32. PubMed ID: 817662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In vitro activity of ticarcillin against anaerobic bacteria compared with that of carbenicillin and penicillin. Roy I; Bach V; Thadepalli H Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1977 Feb; 11(2):258-61. PubMed ID: 848931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. In vitro activity of ticarcillin, carbenicillin and ampicillin against some gram-negative bacilli. Legakis NJ; Papavassiliou J J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1975 Nov; 28(11):912-9. PubMed ID: 811636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Piperacillin susceptibility tests by the single-disk agar diffusion technique. Barry AL; Thornsberry C; Badal RE; Baker CN; Jones RN; Gerlach EH Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Sep; 16(3):378-85. PubMed ID: 507794 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Combined activitiy of clavulanic acid and ticarcillin against ticarcillin-resistant, gram-negative bacilli. Paisley JW; Washington JA Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1978 Aug; 14(2):224-7. PubMed ID: 308792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. In vitro activity of piperacillin compared with that of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, ampicillin, cephalothin, and cefamandole against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae. Shah PP; Briedis DJ; Robson HG; Conterato JP Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Mar; 15(3):346-50. PubMed ID: 111609 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. In vitro activity of carbenicillin, ticarcillin, sisomicin and netilmicin alone and in combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Watanakunakorn C; Glotzbecker C Chemotherapy; 1978; 24(6):343-6. PubMed ID: 100282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Agar disk diffusion susceptibility characteristics of azlocillin, carbenicillin, mezlocillin, piperacillin, and ticarcillin. Phaneuf D; Neu HC Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1979 Nov; 16(5):625-30. PubMed ID: 118706 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparative in vitro evaluation of the effects of ticarcillin and carbenicillin upon Psuedomonas aeruginosa. Kalkani E; Marketos N Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Jan; 9(1):89-90. PubMed ID: 816248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative activity in vitro of ticarcillin, BL-P1654, and carbenicillin. Eickhoff TC; Ehret JM Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1976 Aug; 10(2):241-4. PubMed ID: 984764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative in vitro activity of LY 127935 (6059-S), seven cephalosporins, three aminoglycosides, carbenicillin, and ticarcillin. Watanakunakorn C; Glotzbecker C J Antibiot (Tokyo); 1979 Oct; 32(10):1019-24. PubMed ID: 528361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to ticarcillin and carbenicillin (comparative study)]. García Rodríguez JA; Gómez García AC; García Sánchez JE; Saenz González M Rev Clin Esp; 1977 Aug 15-31; 146(3-4):157-9. PubMed ID: 411159 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative activities of the oxa-beta-lactam LY127935, cefotaxime, cefoperazone, cefamandole, and ticarcillin against multiply resistant gram-negative bacilli. Hall WH; Opfer BJ; Gerding DN Antimicrob Agents Chemother; 1980 Feb; 17(2):273-9. PubMed ID: 6247970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]