These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. A comparative study of rate characteristics in cleft palate and noncleft palate speakers. Lass NJ; Noll JD Cleft Palate J; 1970 Jan; 7():275-83. PubMed ID: 5266338 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Australian adults' production of /n/: an EPG investigation. McLeod S Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):99-107. PubMed ID: 16428225 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Training voluntary pharyngeal wall movements in children with normal and inadequate velopharyngeal closure. Tash EL; Shelton RL; Knox AW; Michel JF Cleft Palate J; 1971 Jul; 8():277-90. PubMed ID: 5284402 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Perceptual and acoustic evidence of speaker adaptation to a thin pseudopalate. Searl J; Evitts P; Davis WJ Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(3):107-16. PubMed ID: 16966153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Same noses, different nasalance scores: data from normal subjects and cleft palate speakers for three systems for nasalance analysis. Bressmann T; Klaiman P; Fischbach S Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(2-3):163-70. PubMed ID: 16428233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical research methodology in evaluating the therapeutic process. Van Demark DR Cleft Palate J; 1971 Jan; 8():26-35. PubMed ID: 5278759 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Proof of nasality by means of acoustic analysis]. Sedlácková E Folia Phoniatr (Basel); 1973; 25(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 4700767 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. On the relationship between palate shape and articulatory behavior. Brunner J; Fuchs S; Perrier P J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3936-49. PubMed ID: 19507976 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ratings and measures of cleft palate speech. Subtelny JD; Van Hattum RJ; Myers BB Cleft Palate J; 1972 Jan; 9(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 4500292 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Nasal perflation and its significance for the speech of the cleft patient]. Andrä A; Dieckmann O Dtsch Zahn Mund Kieferheilkd Zentralbl Gesamte; 1974 Jun; 62(4):348-55. PubMed ID: 4528246 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Articulatory additions to the classical description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. Trost JE Cleft Palate J; 1981 Jul; 18(3):193-203. PubMed ID: 6941865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech and language development in toddlers with and without cleft palate. Priester GH; Goorhuis-Brouwer SM Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2008 Jun; 72(6):801-6. PubMed ID: 18384888 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Observed effects of velopharyngeal orifice size on vowel identification and vowel nasality. Watterson T; Emanuel F Cleft Palate J; 1981 Oct; 18(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 6945158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. An accelerometric approach to nasality measurement: a preliminary report. Horii Y Cleft Palate J; 1980 Jul; 17(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 6930999 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Forward coarticulation of velar movement at marked junctural boundaries. Mclean M J Speech Hear Res; 1973 Jun; 16(2):286-96. PubMed ID: 4723986 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of oral-nasal coupling on whispered vowel spectra. Watterson T; Emanuel F Cleft Palate J; 1981 Jan; 18(1):24-38. PubMed ID: 6936099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Speech compensation for prosthodontically created palatal asymmetries. Hamlet SL J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Mar; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 3280874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]