These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4271919)
1. [Tissue compatibility of non-absorptive suture materials (Permahand and Dacrofil) (a statistical comparative study)]. Parkash O Zentralbl Chir; 1973 Sep; 98(39):1393-7. PubMed ID: 4271919 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Clinical trial of a new absorbable synthetic suture material: polyglycolic acid. Turner FW; Griswold WA; Janzen HW; Milner JF; Rivers LF Can J Surg; 1972 Nov; 15(6):389-93. PubMed ID: 4563938 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Reabsorption of sutures of the abdominal wall]. Caron R; Gorla C; Florianello F Minerva Chir; 1988 Oct; 43(19):1605-7. PubMed ID: 2976481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [A case of intestinal hemorrhage caused by post-appendectomy granuloma of the cecum]. Quaglia M; Baldi A Minerva Chir; 1975 Jan 15-31; 30(1-2):54-7. PubMed ID: 1090859 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical and an experimental study of suture sinuses in abdominal wounds. Greaney MG Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1982 Nov; 155(5):712-6. PubMed ID: 7135179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [The problem of suppurative grafts in recurrent eventrations. Its therapy using stainless steel mesh]. Galeano F; Gonzalez Aguilar O; Lado A; Stescobich D; Pizzimbono C Prensa Med Argent; 1968 May; 55(10):437-43. PubMed ID: 4243457 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A case of suture granuloma occurring 25 years after an appendectomy. Ichimiya M; Hamamoto Y; Muto M J Dermatol; 2003 Aug; 30(8):634-6. PubMed ID: 12928536 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of prosthetic materials used for abdominal wall defects or hernias (an experimental study). Sahin M; Hasanoğlu A; Erbilen M; Orakçi V; Bülbüloğlu E; Ertaş E Acta Chir Hung; 1995-1996; 35(3-4):291-5. PubMed ID: 9262726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Comparative evaluation of the effect of biologically active and ordinary surgical suture materials on the course of the wound process]. Tolstykh PI; Vasil'kova ZF; Arutiunian BN; Struchkov IuV; Berchenko GN Khirurgiia (Mosk); 1980 Nov; (11):66-73. PubMed ID: 7003213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Colic anastomosis. Experimental study of sutures in one plane of the rabbit colon; comparison of direct and intraluminal sutures]. Le Douarec P; Jouanneau P J Chir (Paris); 1972 Nov; 104(5):451-64. PubMed ID: 4574475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Suture line ulcers after gastric surgery. Kalima TV; Asp K Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1973 Jun; 62(6):370-4. PubMed ID: 4592218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Normal and pathological ultrastructure of the human iris; experimental iris suture in rabbits and monkeys. Witmer R; Remé C Adv Ophthalmol; 1975; 30():184-99. PubMed ID: 1098427 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Tissue reaction in microvessel anastomoses. Comparative study of resorbable and nonresorbable suture material]. Kaletsch B; Rehm KE; Stambolis C Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir; 1982; 14(2):99-102. PubMed ID: 6763589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Review of the literature on ophthalmic sutures. Axmith K; McCulloch C Adv Ophthalmol; 1976; 33():45-9. PubMed ID: 790909 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]