These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4276020)

  • 1. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. 3. Reproducibility testing and the sources of program errors.
    Bailey JJ; Horton M; Itscoitz SB
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4276020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. II. Application to version D of the PHS program and the Mayo Clinic program of 1968.
    Bailey JJ; Itscoitz SB; Grauer LE; Hirshfeld JW; Horton MR
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):80-7. PubMed ID: 4276019
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. I. Application to the experimental IBM program of 1971.
    Bailey JJ; Itscoitz SB; Hirshfeld JW; Grauer LE; Horton MR
    Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 4276018
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new computer program for analysis of scalar electrocardiograms.
    Bonner RE; Crevasse L; Ferrer MI; Greenfield JC
    Comput Biomed Res; 1972 Dec; 5(6):629-53. PubMed ID: 4264999
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [ECG evaluation by the computer using the USPHS program (author's transl)].
    So CS
    MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1975 Aug; 117(34):1339-44. PubMed ID: 126374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and performance of Mayo-IBM electrocardiographic computer analysis programs (V70).
    Hu KC; Francis DB; Gau GT; Smith RE
    Mayo Clin Proc; 1973 Apr; 48(4):260-8. PubMed ID: 4266427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [A comparison of various computer programmes for analysing the electrocardiogram].
    Meyer J
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Apr; 97(14):552-9. PubMed ID: 4112250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic accuracy of clinicians, the VA program and the Mount Sinai program in the interpretation of electrocardiograms as compared with clinicopathological data.
    Bourdillon PJ; Kilpatrick D
    Adv Cardiol; 1978; 21():165-7. PubMed ID: 145788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer analysis of electrocardiograms with six and twelve leads.
    Schneider PJ; Cooper JK; Birch AA; Dwyer EM
    Public Health Rep (1896); 1970 Oct; 85(10):853-8. PubMed ID: 4248414
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Letter: Evaluating computer ECG programs.
    Pipberger HV; Cornfield J
    Circulation; 1974 Dec; 50(6):1287-8. PubMed ID: 4279148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new scalar electrocardiographic computer program. Clinical evaluation.
    Crevasse L; Ariet M
    JAMA; 1973 Nov; 226(9):1089-93. PubMed ID: 4127225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electrocardiographic differentiation between left ventricular hypertrophy and anterior myocardial infarction.
    Kini PM; Eddleman EE; Pipberger HV
    Circulation; 1970 Nov; 42(5):875-81. PubMed ID: 4249026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multigroup diagnosis of electrocardiograms.
    Cornfield J; Dunn RA; Batchlor CD; Pipberger HV
    Comput Biomed Res; 1973 Feb; 6(1):97-120. PubMed ID: 4266618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of a computer programme for interpretation of 12-lead electrocardiograms.
    Landelius J; Nordgren L
    Ups J Med Sci; 1979; 84(1):37-46. PubMed ID: 155918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer program for diagnostic evaluation of electrocardiograms.
    Wartak J; Milliken JA; Karchmar J
    Comput Biomed Res; 1971 Jun; 4(3):225-38. PubMed ID: 4935055
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Problems in comparing program systems for computer analysis of electrocardiograms].
    Scheidt E; Michaelis J; von Egidy H; Recke S; Lippold R
    Methods Inf Med Suppl; 1973; 7():423-8. PubMed ID: 4281849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Remarks on the design of a small computer-aided ECG analysis system.
    Szlávik F; Bolyky J; Kozmann G; Wolf T; Antalóczy Z; Regös L
    Adv Cardiol; 1981; 28():99-101. PubMed ID: 6453513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The impact of an ECG computer analysis program on the cardiologist's interpretation. A cooperative study.
    Milliken JA; Pipberger H; Pipberger HV; Araoye MA; Ari R; Burggraf GW; Fletcher RD; Katz RJ; Lopez EA; McCans JL; Silver AM
    J Electrocardiol; 1983 Apr; 16(2):141-9. PubMed ID: 6222129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A new method for automated detection of the R-on-T phenomenon.
    Breithardt G; Loogen F; Schmiel FK; Seipel L
    Am Heart J; 1975 Jun; 89(6):759-65. PubMed ID: 1093370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer-assisted interpretation of orthogonal electrocardiograms and vectorcardiograms by the Louvain system.
    Brohet C; Derwael-Barchy C; Fesler R; Brasseur L
    Acta Cardiol Suppl; 1981; 26():19-28. PubMed ID: 6461152
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.