These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Results of the round window electrical stimulation in 460 cases of total deafness. Meyer B; Drira M; Gegu D; Chouard CH Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1984; 411():168-76. PubMed ID: 6596841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Non-surgical recording of cochlear microphonics in man]. Yamaura K Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1970 Feb; 73(2):154-77. PubMed ID: 5462323 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Audiometry using thoracic electro-impedancography]. Van den Eeckhaut J; Gersdorff M; Sneppe R; Vogeleer M Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1974; 28(1):146-51. PubMed ID: 4837381 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. An objective evaluation of retrocochlear function by means of CNT (Cochlear Nerve Tester). Latkowski B; Gryczynski M; Jozwiak J; Krupa D; Makowski A; Komorowska A; Sidor W Panminerva Med; 1993 Dec; 35(4):197-200. PubMed ID: 8202331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Surgical results of cochlear implantation in malformed cochlea. Sennaroglu L; Sarac S; Ergin T Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):615-23. PubMed ID: 16788416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Four years of clinical use of electrocochleography. Portmann M; Portmann CI; Nègrevergne M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):537-9. PubMed ID: 4460147 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Clinical electro-cochleography: a review of 106 cases. Beagley HA; Hutton JN; Hayes RA J Laryngol Otol; 1974 Oct; 88(10):993-1000. PubMed ID: 4470587 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The evaluation of cochlear frequency analysis in the clinic. Harrison RV Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1982; 103(5):405-10. PubMed ID: 7182889 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Can we use the cochlear microphonic in electrocochleography. Beagley HA Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):531-6. PubMed ID: 4460146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Electrocochleography or evoked cortical responses: which is preferable in diagnosis of hearing loss. Sohmer H; Pratt H; Feinmesser M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1974; 95(7-8):515-22. PubMed ID: 4460144 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. [Electro-cochleography in adults and in children. Electro-physiological study of the peripheral receptor (author's transl)]. Aran JM; Portmann M; Portmann C; Pelerin J Audiology; 1972; 11(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 4669913 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Electro-cochleography in adults and in children. Electro-physiological study of the peripheral receptor (author's transl)]. Aran JM; Portmann M; Portmann C; Pelerin J Audiology; 1972; 11(1):77-89. PubMed ID: 4671188 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. [Separation of the cerebro-audiogram (CAG), neuro-audiogram (NAG) and oto-audiogram (OAG) in the objection audiometry]. Spreng M; Keidel WD Arch Klin Exp Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd; 1967; 189(3):225-46. PubMed ID: 5595706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Measurement of cochlear microphonics with surface electrodes. Winfield AW; Morgan RJ Biomed Sci Instrum; 1972 May; 9():169-70. PubMed ID: 5029006 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Further data, contributed by electrocochleography, on the function of normal and pathological peripheral receptors]. Aran JM Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg; 1972; 26(6):671-83. PubMed ID: 4669681 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. COCHLEO-PUPILLAR RESPONSE DURING SLEEP. AN OBJECTIVE TEST FOR RECRUITMENT FOR YOUNG CHILDREN. SUZUKI T; KAMIJO Y; SASAKI H Pract Otorhinolaryngol (Basel); 1964; 26():248-57. PubMed ID: 14197497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Cochlear audiometry (electro-cochleography) during the neonatal period. Leiberman A; Sohmer H; Szabo G Dev Med Child Neurol; 1973 Feb; 15(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 4729421 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]