These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4281351)
1. Comparison of 137Cs irradiation and mitomycin C treatment of stimulator cells in the mixed lymphocyte culture reaction. Lightbody J; Kong YC Cell Immunol; 1974 Aug; 13(2):326-30. PubMed ID: 4281351 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of irradiated and mitomycin-treated mouse spleen cells as stimulating cells in mixed lymphocyte cultures and in vitro sensitization. Hodes RJ; Terry WD J Immunol; 1974 Jul; 113(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 4275549 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Syngeneic mixed lymphocyte reaction between thymocytes and peripheral lymphoid cells in mice: strain specificity and nature of the target cell. Von Boehmer H; Adams PB J Immunol; 1973 Feb; 110(2):376-83. PubMed ID: 4265142 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Immune responses in vitro. II. Mixed leukocyte interaction in a protein-free medium. Katz-Heber E; Peck AB; Click RE Eur J Immunol; 1973 Jul; 3(7):379-85. PubMed ID: 4271346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Immune responses in vitro. 3. Enhancement of the mouse mixed lymphocyte interaction by isologous and homologous sera. Peck AB; Click RE Eur J Immunol; 1973 Jul; 3(7):385-92. PubMed ID: 4271347 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. DNA replication in mixed lymphocyte culture. Lanotte M; Panijel J Nat New Biol; 1973 Sep; 245(141):41-4. PubMed ID: 4269657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of irradiation and mitomycin as blocking agents in the mixed lymphocyte reaction. Anderson RE; Pogue L; Troup GM; Standefer JC Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1984 May; 108(5):363-7. PubMed ID: 6231901 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Synergistic response between thymus and lymph node cells in the mixed lymphocyte culture. Tittor W; Walford RL Nature; 1974 Feb; 247(5440):371-3. PubMed ID: 4274156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Microplate culture of mouse lymph node cells. I. Quantitation of responses to allogeneic lymphocytes endotoxin and phytomitogens. Thorpe PE; Knight SC J Immunol Methods; 1974 Oct; 5(4):387-404. PubMed ID: 4279265 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Interaction of thymus lymphocytes with histoincompatible cells. IV. Mixed lymphocyte reactions of activated thymus lymphocytes. Cheers C; Sprent J; Miller JF Cell Immunol; 1974 Jan; 10(1):57-67. PubMed ID: 4281718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Studies of the Epstein-Barr virus-host relationship: autochthonous and allogeneic lymphocyte stimulation by lymphoblast cell lines in mixed cell culture. Bausher JC; Smith RT Clin Immunol Immunopathol; 1973 Jan; 1(2):270-81. PubMed ID: 4357798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of immunosuppressive treatment on the in vitro activity of mouse lymphoid cells after stimulation by PHA and allogeneic cells. Snippe H; Bruijnzeel PL; Willers JM Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol; 1973; 45(5):731-43. PubMed ID: 4270693 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Inhibition of cellular immune reactions by cyclophosphamide analogues ifosfamide and trofosfamide. I. Mixed lymphocyte reaction. Devlin RG; Schwartz NL; Baronowsky PE; Zygmunt WA Proc Soc Exp Biol Med; 1974 Feb; 145(2):389-91. PubMed ID: 4273394 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A unique 'leukaemic' T lymphoid cell line: absence of stimulating effect in mixed lymphocyte reaction. Lack of MLR-S in leukaemic T lymphoid cells. Han T; Minowada J Clin Exp Immunol; 1973 Dec; 15(4):535-41. PubMed ID: 4273215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Generation of T memory cells in one-way mixed lymphocyte culture. I. Selective recovery of activated cells and their reversion to 'secondary' lymphocytes. Andersson LC; Häyry P Scand J Immunol; 1974; 3(4):461-9. PubMed ID: 4277493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]