These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. [An ecg-program with multivariate diagnostic classification (author's transl)]. Abel H; Zywietz C; Klusmeir S Z Kardiol; 1977 Mar; 66(3):146-9. PubMed ID: 140549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Electrocardiographic differentiation between left ventricular hypertrophy and anterior myocardial infarction. Kini PM; Eddleman EE; Pipberger HV Circulation; 1970 Nov; 42(5):875-81. PubMed ID: 4249026 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Diagnostic accuracy of a 15-lead hybrid computer-aided electrocardiographic system. Talbot S; Dreifus LS; Watanabe Y; Reich M; Chiang R; Morris K Eur J Cardiol; 1973 Sep; 1(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 4618198 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Cancellation of the abnormal QRS complex of heart disease. SEIDEN GE; KEISMAN RA Am Heart J; 1956 Jul; 52(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 13326835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. [A method of global evaluation of a program for automatic ECG analysis. The Demeester-Saget program]. Dragodanne C; Frank R; Thomas D; Berger C; Hirel JC; Grosgogeat Y Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1981 Jul; 74(7):771-80. PubMed ID: 6457577 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of 3 and 12 lead cardiogram computer interpretations. Macfarlane PW; Lorimer AR; Lawrie TD Br Heart J; 1970 Jul; 32(4):554-5. PubMed ID: 4247120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [Computer analysis of the electrocardiograms in myocardial infarct]. Swiderska-Błońska T Pol Tyg Lek; 1980 Apr; 35(15):531-4. PubMed ID: 6995958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. A method for evaluating computer programs for electrocardiographic interpretation. 3. Reproducibility testing and the sources of program errors. Bailey JJ; Horton M; Itscoitz SB Circulation; 1974 Jul; 50(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 4276020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Computerized electrocardiography--an adjunct to the physician. Laks MM; Selvester RH N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1803-4. PubMed ID: 1834941 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Electrocardiograms of the month. Rubin IL; Frieden J N Y State J Med; 1973 Oct; 73(19):2359-60. PubMed ID: 4518792 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Interesting electrocardiograms. Clagett AH Del Med J; 1969 Feb; 41(2):63 passim. PubMed ID: 5766809 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Experience in teaching an all-purpose electronic computer to establish electrocardiographic diagnosis of myocardial infarct]. Kornevskaia TB; Savchenko LA Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR; 1968; 23(5):60-2. PubMed ID: 4907200 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. [Significance of the corrected orthogonal and conventional electrocardiography in clinical practice]. Giegler I; Rübesamen M; Grossmann K; Lehmann K; Schambach H; Lewin C Z Kardiol; 1974 Nov; 63(11):1023-33. PubMed ID: 4281192 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Computer analysis of serial electrocardiograms. Pryor TA; Lindsay AE; England RW Comput Biomed Res; 1972 Dec; 5(6):709-14. PubMed ID: 4566956 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Electrocardiograms of the month. Rubin IL; Frieden J N Y State J Med; 1978 Aug; 78(9):1448-9. PubMed ID: 276691 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Electrocardiograms of the month. Rubin IL; Frieden J N Y State J Med; 1974 Aug; 74(9):1627-8. PubMed ID: 4526621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]