These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 429057)

  • 1. Research review at NIH.
    Lipsett MB; Fletcher JC; Secundy M
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):18-21. PubMed ID: 429057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The National Commission on IRBs: an evolutionary approach.
    Veatch RM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):22-8. PubMed ID: 429058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The development of policy guidelines governing human experimentation in the United States: a case study of public policy-making for science and technology.
    Frankel MS
    Ethics Sci Med; 1975 May; 2(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 765128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Ten ways to improve IRBs.
    Robertson JA
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Feb; 9(1):29-33. PubMed ID: 429060
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Conducting empirical research on informed consent: challenges and questions.
    Sachs GA; Hougham GW; Sugarman J; Agre P; Broome ME; Geller G; Kass N; Kodish E; Mintz J; Roberts LW; Sankar P; Siminoff LA; Sorenson J; Weiss A
    IRB; 2003; Suppl 25(5):S4-S10. PubMed ID: 14870730
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
    Katz J
    IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethical issues in clinical neurological research.
    Shore D; Berg K; Mullican C
    J Calif Alliance Ment Ill; 1994; 5(1):61-2. PubMed ID: 11653329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Institutional review boards. A net too thin.
    Palca J
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1996; 26(3):4. PubMed ID: 8736666
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Federal investigation concludes that institutional review boards are in trouble.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1998 Aug; 13(8):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657190
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The strengths and weaknesses of university review committees to protect human rights.
    Dymond S
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1974 Aug; 55(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 4844661
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. NIH ethics office clamps down on Duke...as basic scientists feel the pinch in LA.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1999 May; 399(6733):190. PubMed ID: 10353232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The NIH trials of growth hormone for short stature.
    Tauer CA
    IRB; 1994 May; 16(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 11659923
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exempt research: procedures in the intramural research program of the National Institutes of Health.
    Wichman A; Mills D; Sandler AL
    IRB; 1996; 18(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 11654755
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
    van Eys J; Levine RJ
    IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A pilot project: bioethics consultants as non-voting members of IRBs at the National Institutes of Health.
    DeRenzo EG; Wichman A
    IRB; 1990; 12(6):6-8. PubMed ID: 11651266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research compliance changes will affect rules on protection of human subjects.
    Maloney DM
    Hum Res Rep; 1999 May; 14(5):1-2. PubMed ID: 11657776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nondevelopmental research on human subjects: the impact of the recommendations of the National Commission.
    Levine RJ
    Fed Proc; 1977 Sep; 36(10):2359-64. PubMed ID: 892005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lay participation in medical policy making. II. Human experimentation committees: professional or representative?
    Veatch RM
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1975 Oct; 5(5):31-40. PubMed ID: 1184371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Ethics of clinical trials for research ethics boards: proceedings of a national workshop.
    National Council on Bioethics in Human Research (Canada)
    NCBHR Commun; 1991; 2(2):4-23. PubMed ID: 11659919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.