113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 429627)
1. The use of contrast -- detail -- dose evaluation of image quality in a computed tomographic scanner.
Cohen G; DiBianca FA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 429627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contrast--detail--dose analysis of six different computed tomographic scanners.
Cohen G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 429628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy dependence of contrast-detail-dose and object-detectability-dose curves for CT scanners.
Wagner LK; Cohen G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Apr; 6(2):378-82. PubMed ID: 7076929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of nonlinear three-dimensional optimized reconstruction algorithm filter on image quality and radiation dose: validation on phantoms.
Bai M; Chen J; Raupach R; Suess C; Tao Y; Peng M
Med Phys; 2009 Jan; 36(1):95-7. PubMed ID: 19235377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of modulation transfer function shape on computed tomographic image quality.
Joseph PM; Stockham CD
Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 7122876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Improvements to image quality using hybrid and model-based iterative reconstructions: a phantom study.
Aurumskjöld ML; Ydström K; Tingberg A; Söderberg M
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 26924832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ray contribution masks for structure adaptive sinogram filtering.
Balda M; Hornegger J; Heismann B
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2012 Jun; 31(6):1228-39. PubMed ID: 22333988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system.
Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Lehmann KJ
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2289-303. PubMed ID: 15551554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast-to-noise ratio and low-contrast object resolution on full- and low-dose MDCT: SAFIRE versus filtered back projection in a low-contrast object phantom and in the liver.
Baker ME; Dong F; Primak A; Obuchowski NA; Einstein D; Gandhi N; Herts BR; Purysko A; Remer E; Vachhani N
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Jul; 199(1):8-18. PubMed ID: 22733888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial resolution analysis of computed tomographic images.
Assimakopoulos PA; Boyd DP; Jaschke W; Lipton MJ
Invest Radiol; 1986 Mar; 21(3):260-71. PubMed ID: 3957600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom.
Ryu YJ; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Ha S; Kim WS; Kim IO
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 26546568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of operator-selected image noise index and reconstruction slice thickness on patient radiation dose in 64-MDCT.
Kanal KM; Stewart BK; Kolokythas O; Shuman WP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jul; 189(1):219-25. PubMed ID: 17579174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A method for determining the modulation transfer function from thick microwire profiles measured with x-ray microcomputed tomography.
Nakaya Y; Kawata Y; Niki N; Umetatni K; Ohmatsu H; Moriyama N
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4347-64. PubMed ID: 22830768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Characteristic image quality of a third generation dual-source MDCT scanner: Noise, resolution, and detectability.
Solomon J; Wilson J; Samei E
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4941-53. PubMed ID: 26233220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Does a combination of dose modulation with fast gantry rotation time limit CT image quality?
Israel GM; Herlihy S; Rubinowitz AN; Cornfeld D; Brink J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):140-4. PubMed ID: 18562737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of x-ray tube parameters and iodine concentration on image quality and radiation dose in cerebral pediatric and adult CT angiography: a phantom study.
Papadakis AE; Perisinakis K; Raissaki M; Damilakis J
Invest Radiol; 2013 Apr; 48(4):192-9. PubMed ID: 23344518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose.
Kolditz D; Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2010 Jun; 37(6):2719-30. PubMed ID: 20632582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
