107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 429628)
1. Contrast--detail--dose analysis of six different computed tomographic scanners.
Cohen G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 429628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The use of contrast -- detail -- dose evaluation of image quality in a computed tomographic scanner.
Cohen G; DiBianca FA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 429627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Energy dependence of contrast-detail-dose and object-detectability-dose curves for CT scanners.
Wagner LK; Cohen G
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Apr; 6(2):378-82. PubMed ID: 7076929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of x-ray filtration on dose and image performance of CT scanners.
Szulc M; Judy PF
Med Phys; 1979; 6(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 545116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners.
Brasch RC; Boyd DP; Gooding CA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jul; 131(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 97992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The influence of modulation transfer function shape on computed tomographic image quality.
Joseph PM; Stockham CD
Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 7122876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Time-delayed summation as a means of improving resolution on fast rotating computed tomography systems.
Nowak T; Hupfer M; Althoff F; Brauweiler R; Eisa F; Steiding C; Kalender WA
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2249-60. PubMed ID: 22482646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computed tomographic scanning in children: II. An updated comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial scanners.
Brasch RC; Cann CE
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 6976686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system.
Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Lehmann KJ
Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2289-303. PubMed ID: 15551554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom.
Ryu YJ; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Ha S; Kim WS; Kim IO
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 26546568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of evaluation of computed tomography scanners using a phantom model.
Bellon EM; Miraldi FD; Wiesen EJ
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 Mar; 132(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 106634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
