These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 429628)

  • 1. Contrast--detail--dose analysis of six different computed tomographic scanners.
    Cohen G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):197-203. PubMed ID: 429628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The use of contrast -- detail -- dose evaluation of image quality in a computed tomographic scanner.
    Cohen G; DiBianca FA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1979 Apr; 3(2):189-95. PubMed ID: 429627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Energy dependence of contrast-detail-dose and object-detectability-dose curves for CT scanners.
    Wagner LK; Cohen G
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1982 Apr; 6(2):378-82. PubMed ID: 7076929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of x-ray filtration on dose and image performance of CT scanners.
    Szulc M; Judy PF
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(6):479-86. PubMed ID: 545116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions.
    Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K
    Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image quality of conventional images of dual-layer SPECTRAL CT: A phantom study.
    van Ommen F; Bennink E; Vlassenbroek A; Dankbaar JW; Schilham AMR; Viergever MA; de Jong HWAM
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3031-3042. PubMed ID: 29749624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Characterization of a commercial hybrid iterative and model-based reconstruction algorithm in radiation oncology.
    Price RG; Vance S; Cattaneo R; Schultz L; Elshaikh MA; Chetty IJ; Glide-Hurst CK
    Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081907. PubMed ID: 25086538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computed tomographic scanning in children: comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial CT scanners.
    Brasch RC; Boyd DP; Gooding CA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jul; 131(1):95-101. PubMed ID: 97992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of modulation transfer function shape on computed tomographic image quality.
    Joseph PM; Stockham CD
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):179-85. PubMed ID: 7122876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners.
    Suomalainen A; Kiljunen T; Käser Y; Peltola J; Kortesniemi M
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2009 Sep; 38(6):367-78. PubMed ID: 19700530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards task-based assessment of CT performance: system and object MTF across different reconstruction algorithms.
    Richard S; Husarik DB; Yadava G; Murphy SN; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4115-22. PubMed ID: 22830744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Time-delayed summation as a means of improving resolution on fast rotating computed tomography systems.
    Nowak T; Hupfer M; Althoff F; Brauweiler R; Eisa F; Steiding C; Kalender WA
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):2249-60. PubMed ID: 22482646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computed tomographic scanning in children: II. An updated comparison of radiation dose and resolving power of commercial scanners.
    Brasch RC; Cann CE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1982 Jan; 138(1):127-33. PubMed ID: 6976686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Novel methods of measuring single scan dose profiles and cumulative dose in CT.
    Nakonechny KD; Fallone BG; Rathee S
    Med Phys; 2005 Jan; 32(1):98-109. PubMed ID: 15719960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Physical evaluation of a needle photostimulable phosphor based CR mammography system.
    Marshall NW; Lemmens K; Bosmans H
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):811-24. PubMed ID: 22320791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
    Marshall NW
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The contrast-detail behaviour of a photostimulable phosphor based computed radiography system.
    Marshall NW; Faulkner K; Busch HP; Lehmann KJ
    Phys Med Biol; 1994 Dec; 39(12):2289-303. PubMed ID: 15551554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction: comparative image quality and radiation dose with a pediatric computed tomography phantom.
    Ryu YJ; Choi YH; Cheon JE; Ha S; Kim WS; Kim IO
    Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Mar; 46(3):303-15. PubMed ID: 26546568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners.
    Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H
    Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance of evaluation of computed tomography scanners using a phantom model.
    Bellon EM; Miraldi FD; Wiesen EJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1979 Mar; 132(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 106634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.