344 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 429958)
1. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli: II. Effects of changes in stimulus probability.
Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Jan; 31(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 429958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Signal probability, reinforcement and signal detection.
McCarthy D; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 512570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Control of pigeons' matching-to-sample performance by differential sample response requirements.
Hogan DE; Zentall TR; Pace G
Am J Psychol; 1983; 96(1):37-49. PubMed ID: 6859346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of differential reinforcement expectancies on successive matching-to-sample performance in pigeons.
DeLong RE; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1981 Oct; 7(4):394-412. PubMed ID: 7288370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
Kuroda T; Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Separating the reinforcing and discriminative properties of brief-stimulus presentations in second-order schedules.
Cohen SL; Calisto G; Lentz BE
J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):149-56. PubMed ID: 501268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Observing responses maintained by conditional discriminative stimuli.
Ohta A
J Exp Anal Behav; 1987 Nov; 48(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 3430109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Drug effects on responding maintained by stimulus-reinforcer and response-reinforcer contingencies.
Spealman RD; Katz JL; Witkin JM
J Exp Anal Behav; 1978 Sep; 30(2):187-96. PubMed ID: 702026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matching and maximizing with concurrent ratio-interval schedules.
Green L; Rachlin H; Hanson J
J Exp Anal Behav; 1983 Nov; 40(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 6655424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of stimulus orderability and reinforcement history on transitive responding in pigeons.
Lazareva OF; Wasserman EA
Behav Processes; 2006 May; 72(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 16460886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Superordinate category formation in pigeons: association with a common delay or probability of food reinforcement makes perceptually dissimilar stimuli functionally equivalent.
Astley SL; Wasserman EA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):415-32. PubMed ID: 10531658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The effects of amount of training per reversal on successive reversals of a color discrimination.
Beale IL
J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 Nov; 14(3):345-52. PubMed ID: 5491010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The role of discriminative stimuli in modulating drug action.
Laties VG
Fed Proc; 1975 Aug; 34(9):1880-8. PubMed ID: 1097270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. "Turning back the clock" on serial-stimulus sign tracking.
Allan RW; Matthews TJ
J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Nov; 56(3):427-43. PubMed ID: 1774537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reinforcement contingencies as discriminative stimuli.
Lattal KA
J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Mar; 23(2):241-6. PubMed ID: 16811845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Independence of sensitivity to relative reinforcement rate and discriminability in signal detection.
McCarthy D; Davison M
J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Nov; 34(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 7452132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A relational differential outcomes effect: pigeons can classify outcomes as "good" and "better".
Friedrich AM; Zentall TR
Anim Cogn; 2010 Mar; 13(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 19779744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Discrimination of temporal relations by pigeons.
Dreyfus LR; Fetterman JG; Smith LD; Stubbs DA
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1988 Oct; 14(4):349-67. PubMed ID: 3183576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Discriminative proprieties of Vary and Repeat contingencies.
Souza Ada S; Abreu-Rodrigues J
Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):116-25. PubMed ID: 20619326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Suboptimal criterion setting in a perceptual choice task with asymmetric reinforcement.
Stüttgen MC; Kasties N; Lengersdorf D; Starosta S; Güntürkün O; Jäkel F
Behav Processes; 2013 Jun; 96():59-70. PubMed ID: 23466903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
