These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

341 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 429958)

  • 41. Pigeons prefer conditional stimuli over their absence: a comment on Roberts et al. (2009).
    Zentall TR; Stagner JP
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Oct; 36(4):506-9. PubMed ID: 20718554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The emergence of symmetry in a conditional discrimination task using different responses as propioceptive samples in pigeons.
    García A; Benjumea S
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2006 Jul; 86(1):65-80. PubMed ID: 16903493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Color preference in pigeons: stimulus intensity and reinforcement contingency effects in the avoidance of blue stimuli.
    Biederman GB; McDonald KG; Heighington GA; Vanayan M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):265-73. PubMed ID: 3361267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Conditioned reinforcement by conditional discriminative stimuli.
    Ohta A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1988 Mar; 49(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 3361266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Effects of reinforcement scheduling on simultaneous discrimination performance.
    Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1967 May; 10(3):251-60. PubMed ID: 6056798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A model for food and stimulus changes that signal time-based contingency changes.
    Cowie S; Davison M; Elliffe D
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Nov; 102(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 25219928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Choice as a dependent measure in autoshaping: sensitivity to frequency and duration of food presentation.
    Picker M; Poling A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 May; 37(3):393-406. PubMed ID: 7097152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of varying stimulus disparity and the reinforcer ratio in concurrent-schedule and signal-detection procedures.
    Alsop B; Davison M
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Jul; 56(1):67-80. PubMed ID: 1940764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Reward magnitude and timing in pigeons.
    Ludvig EA; Balci F; Spetch ML
    Behav Processes; 2011 Mar; 86(3):359-63. PubMed ID: 21244854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Accuracy of discrimination, rate of responding, and resistance to change.
    Nevin JA; Milo J; Odum AL; Shahan TA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 May; 79(3):307-21. PubMed ID: 12908760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Stimulus control acquired by components of two color-form compound stimuli.
    Born DG; Peterson JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1969 May; 12(3):437-42. PubMed ID: 5789240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differential reinforcement and signal detection.
    Nevin JA; Olson K; Mandell C; Yarensky P
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Nov; 24(3):355-67. PubMed ID: 1194831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The resistance to change of observing.
    Shahan TA; Magee A; Dobberstein A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2003 Nov; 80(3):273-93. PubMed ID: 14964708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Temporal discrimination and a free-operant psychophysical procedure.
    Stubbs DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1980 Mar; 33(2):167-85. PubMed ID: 7365406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Correspondence as conditional stimulus control: insights from experiments with pigeons.
    Lattal KA; Doepke KJ
    J Appl Behav Anal; 2001; 34(2):127-44. PubMed ID: 11421307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Choice behavior in transition: development of preference for the higher probability of reinforcement.
    Bailey JT; Mazur JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):409-22. PubMed ID: 2341823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The discrimination of stimulus duration by pigeons.
    Stubbs A
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1968 May; 11(3):223-38. PubMed ID: 5660703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The role of contingency discriminability in suboptimal choice.
    López-Tolsa GE; Orduña V
    Behav Processes; 2021 Dec; 193():104511. PubMed ID: 34562512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Matching-to-sample accuracy on fixed-ratio schedules.
    Thomas JR
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Sep; 32(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 501271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Role of stimulus-stimulus pairing in matching-to-sample procedure: cross-species comparison of humans and pigeons.
    Ono K; Kubo N; Masano Y
    Behav Processes; 2011 Oct; 88(2):111-20. PubMed ID: 21871543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.