These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 431202)

  • 1. [Gynecologic health screening in Canada and Sweden].
    Rubinstein E
    Lakartidningen; 1979 Mar; 76(12):1083-4. PubMed ID: 431202
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the impact of screening for cancer of the cervix.
    Miller AB
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):149-60. PubMed ID: 3570400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cervical cancer screening programs. I. Epidemiology and natural history of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Can Med Assoc J; 1976 Jun; 114(11):1003-12. PubMed ID: 776378
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of cervical cancer screening in Scandinavia.
    Day NE
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 May; 63(5):714-8. PubMed ID: 6717876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Walton report and its subsequent impact on cervical cancer screening programs in Canada.
    Worth AJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Feb; 63(2):135-9. PubMed ID: 6694805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An analysis of the prevalence and incidence of gynecologic cancer cytologically detected in a population of 175,767 women.
    Kasper TA; Smith ES; Cooper P; Clayton J; Todd D
    Acta Cytol; 1970 May; 14(5):261-9. PubMed ID: 5284264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cervical cancer screening: précis and critique of a recent Canadian report.
    Chiavetta J; Leader SR
    Med J Aust; 1977 Jan 1-8; 1(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 840075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Studs on population screening for early carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Bjerre B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1969; 6():1-140. PubMed ID: 5266058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Report on a three-county cervical cancer screening project.
    Whitlock NH; Long SE; Kuemmerer JM
    J S C Med Assoc; 1972 Jun; 68(6):237-46. PubMed ID: 4504050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An assessment of the effectiveness of cervical cytology screening in Sheffield.
    Johnson IS; Milner PC; Todd JN
    Community Med; 1987 May; 9(2):160-70. PubMed ID: 3608418
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evaluating and planning screening programmes.
    Parkin DM; Day NE
    IARC Sci Publ; 1985; (66):45-63. PubMed ID: 4093187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Population screening for cervical carcinoma in Ostergötland.
    Sjöstedt S
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1969; 48():Suppl 3:62. PubMed ID: 5380827
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Detection of cervical cancer at the Bell Telephone Company of Canada (1965-1969)].
    Audet-Lapointe P
    Union Med Can; 1972 Dec; 101(12):2713-6. PubMed ID: 4661704
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Mapping of the natural history of cervical cancer--a pilot case of systems analysis in medicine].
    Gustafsson L
    Lakartidningen; 1985 Mar; 82(10):850, 852-3, 855-6. PubMed ID: 3990450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Results from a cervical cancer screening programme in Manitoba, Canada.
    Choi NW; Nelson NA
    IARC Sci Publ; 1986; (76):61-7. PubMed ID: 3570416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Detection of cancer of the cervix uteri].
    Walton RJ; Blanchet M; Boyes DA; Carmichael J; Marshall KG; Miller AB; Thompson DW
    Union Med Can; 1976 Jul; 105(7):997-1047. PubMed ID: 960289
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved prognosis for cervical cancers due to comprehensive screening.
    Macgregor JE; Fraser ME; Mann EM
    Acta Cytol; 1972; 16(1):14-5. PubMed ID: 4501868
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A screening programme for cervical cancer that worked.
    Hakama M; Louhivuori K
    Cancer Surv; 1988; 7(3):403-16. PubMed ID: 3242792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.