These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 431509)

  • 1. Sensory feedback for artificial limbs.
    Shannon GF
    Med Prog Technol; 1979 Jan; 6(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 431509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Direct neural sensory feedback and control of a prosthetic arm.
    Dhillon GS; Horch KW
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2005 Dec; 13(4):468-72. PubMed ID: 16425828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical application study of externally powered upper-limb prosthetics systems: the VA elbow, the VA hand, and the VA/NU myoelectric hand systems.
    Lewis EA; Sheredos CR; Sowell TT; Houston VL
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):51-136. PubMed ID: 776301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Discrimination of phantom hand sensations elicited by afferent electrical nerve stimulation in below-elbow amputees.
    Anani A; Körner L
    Med Prog Technol; 1979 Jun; 6(3):131-5. PubMed ID: 481362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Management of the upper-limb-deficient child with a powered prosthetic device.
    Glynn MK; Galway HR; Hunter G; Sauter WF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1986 Aug; (209):202-5. PubMed ID: 3731596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sensory feedback in a myoelectric upper limb prosthesis: a preliminary report.
    Brittain RH; Sauter WF; Gibson DA
    Can J Surg; 1979 Sep; 22(5):481-2. PubMed ID: 497919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Residual function in peripheral nerve stumps of amputees: implications for neural control of artificial limbs.
    Dhillon GS; Lawrence SM; Hutchinson DT; Horch KW
    J Hand Surg Am; 2004 Jul; 29(4):605-15; discussion 616-8. PubMed ID: 15249083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The artificial substitution of missing hands with myoelectrical prostheses.
    Näder M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1990 Sep; (258):9-17. PubMed ID: 2203576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Improved grasp force sensitivity for prosthetic hands through force-derivative feedback.
    Engeberg ED; Meek S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Feb; 55(2 Pt 2):817-21. PubMed ID: 18270026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Development of powered prosthetic hands].
    Kato I; Tanaka S
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1976 Feb; 14(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 985948
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Vibrotactile detection thresholds for chest skin of amputees following targeted reinnervation surgery.
    Schultz AE; Marasco PD; Kuiken TA
    Brain Res; 2009 Jan; 1251():121-9. PubMed ID: 19059226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) to aid perceptual embodiment of prosthetic limbs.
    Mulvey MR; Fawkner HJ; Radford H; Johnson MI
    Med Hypotheses; 2009 Feb; 72(2):140-2. PubMed ID: 19026493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electrocutaneous feedback for artificial limbs. Summary progress report. February 1, 1974, through July 31, 1975.
    Prior RE; Lyman J
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1975; (10-24):3-37. PubMed ID: 1227686
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Acceptability of the NYU Number 1 Child-sized Body-powered Hand. New York University.
    Krebs DE; Lembeck W; Fishman S
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 69(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 3341895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Experimental development of a sensory control system for an upper limb myoelectric prosthesis with cosmetic covering.
    Tura A; Lamberti C; Davalli A; Sacchetti R
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 1998 Jan; 35(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 9505249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Sensory feedback control of upper- and lower-extremity motor prostheses.
    Phillips CA
    Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 1988; 16(2):105-40. PubMed ID: 3053043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensory motor systems of artificial and natural hands.
    Chappell PH; Cranny A; Cotton DP; White NM; Beeby SP
    Int J Surg; 2007 Dec; 5(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 18078684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Applications of sensory feedback in motorized upper extremity prosthesis: a review.
    Schofield JS; Evans KR; Carey JP; Hebert JS
    Expert Rev Med Devices; 2014 Sep; 11(5):499-511. PubMed ID: 24928327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A sensory feedback system for an upper-limb amputation prosthesis.
    Clippinger FW; Avery R; Titus BR
    Bull Prosthet Res; 1974; ():247-58. PubMed ID: 4462906
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Scope and problems of rehabilitation engineering].
    Ichikawa K
    Iyodenshi To Seitai Kogaku; 1985 Aug; 23(4):257-70. PubMed ID: 3910889
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.