These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

70 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 432414)

  • 21. Technique charts: the key to radiographic quality.
    Eastman TR
    Radiol Technol; 1975; 46(5):365-8. PubMed ID: 1118546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Quality control measurements at the Central Institute for Radiodiagnosis].
    Nowotny R; Bliem J; Rechtberger W; Pokieser H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():176-9. PubMed ID: 2860860
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Technical controls with test objects for quality assurance of x-ray diagnostic equipment].
    Hagemann G
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1985; 123():138-55. PubMed ID: 2860857
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Methods of evaluation of the quality of x-ray images].
    Novikov VIa
    Med Tekh; 1975; (2):35-8. PubMed ID: 1226094
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Effect of the x-ray tube, film and foil on the quality of the picture].
    Lissner JA
    Rontgenpraxis; 1969 Jan; 22(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 5801166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [The most important requirements relating to the quality of roentgen apparatus in Europe, Japan and USA].
    Franke K
    Rontgenpraxis; 1984 Apr; 37(4):123-9. PubMed ID: 6729607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assurance--a study in radiography.
    Brookes D; Greenwood E; Moxon L
    Radiogr Today; 1991 Jun; 57(649):13-5. PubMed ID: 1910515
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Control of the radiation quality in diagnostic x-ray equipment].
    Blinov NN; Gromov GD; Kuskova NM; Popova TA; Popov VV
    Med Tekh; 1983; (5):35-8. PubMed ID: 6645850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dose reduction and government priorities.
    Holloway AF; Taylor KW; Hobbs BB
    J Can Assoc Radiol; 1984 Jun; 35(2):106. PubMed ID: 6480658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The control of phototimers.
    Pugin JM
    Radiography; 1985; 51(597):141-2. PubMed ID: 4011855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Sources of error in the quality assurance of x-ray equipment].
    Meier N; Lenzen H; Fiebich M
    Radiologe; 1992 Aug; 32(8):384-8. PubMed ID: 1410324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Experiences with acceptance testing of x-ray equipment].
    Eder H
    Rontgenpraxis; 1988 Jul; 41(7):245-7. PubMed ID: 3413584
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Quality assurance in radiology: quality control of radiographic cassettes].
    Ferretti PP; Sarti M; Messori P; Boni L; Seligardi P; Tassoni D; Cattini V; Piccagli V; Barani A; Bianchi C; Borasi G; Troiso A; Soliani Raschini C
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 8975314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Routine quality assurance and results of a diagnostic radiology quality assurance programme.
    Roberts PJ; Fisher K
    Radiobiol Radiother (Berl); 1990; 31(2):189-92. PubMed ID: 2356302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Take the next step in trend charts.
    McKinney WE
    Radiol Technol; 1995; 67(2):181-2. PubMed ID: 8570849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Improving the quality of roentgenograms on the RUM-20 apparatus].
    Galaktionov VI; Popova TA; Gromov GD
    Med Tekh; 1978; (6):44-6. PubMed ID: 723539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Constancy check of beam quality in conventional diagnostic X-ray equipment.
    Costa AM; Badin RS; Leite MS; Caldas LV
    Appl Radiat Isot; 2008 Oct; 66(10):1403-5. PubMed ID: 18434171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [The use of a test phantom in step-shaped forms (test steps) for the clarification of different problem situations in x-ray diagnosis. 1. The use of test steps for the estimation of image quality after modified darkroom technics].
    Parisot M
    Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 1990 Mar; 103(3):92-4. PubMed ID: 2317188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Check lists for the acceptance of new x-ray equipment].
    von Essen HJ; Stargardt A
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1986; 27(1):99-112. PubMed ID: 3961146
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Performance characteristics of X-ray tubes and generators.
    Harrison RM; Forster E
    Radiography; 1984; 50(594):245-8. PubMed ID: 6505169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.