These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 432845)

  • 1. Haste makes waste.
    Hanlon CR
    Tex Med; 1979 Mar; 75(3):118. PubMed ID: 432845
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Push to contain costs could make second opinions part of your routine.
    Leg Aspects Med Pract; 1979 May; 7(5):13-7. PubMed ID: 263207
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Haste makes waste.
    Hanlon CR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1978 Aug; 63(8):1. PubMed ID: 10307971
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Second opinion programs.
    Hanlon CR
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1978 Apr; 63(4):1, 4. PubMed ID: 10316572
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Clipping doctors from referral program spurs them to clip costs.
    Franz J
    Mod Healthc; 1984 Apr; 14(5):116, 118. PubMed ID: 10273485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An update on second surgical opinion programs.
    Lance R; Haug JN
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1978 Dec; 63(12):26-34. PubMed ID: 10316749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [The "second opinion". Experiences in the USA].
    Hempel K; Rutkow I
    Chirurg; 1990 Feb; 61(2):Suppl 13-5. PubMed ID: 2318066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. How much will second opinions cut patient loads?
    Kirchner M
    Med Econ; 1980 May; 57(10):178-89. PubMed ID: 10316967
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Second surgical opinion programs: evaluation deficiencies.
    Dunham MH; Hunt VB
    Wis Med J; 1984 Apr; 83(4):23-4. PubMed ID: 6428066
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Programs prove effective second surgical opinion.
    Employee Benefit Plan Rev; 1984 Oct; 39(4):56, 60, 64. PubMed ID: 10317554
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The extravagant, wasteful, and superfluous debate about unnecessary surgery.
    Annas GJ
    Hastings Cent Rep; 1979 Apr; 9(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 457391
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Insurer would cut rates for second-surgical-opinion plans.
    Med World News; 1979 Feb; 20(3):28. PubMed ID: 10316772
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Second opinion plan approved.
    Am Med News; 1979 Mar; 22(13):1, 13. PubMed ID: 10325176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Blues' second opinion plans growing but, so far, few are using option.
    Natl Underwrit Life Health; 1978 Sep; 82(38):6-7. PubMed ID: 10316688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Second surgical opinions: savings or waste?
    Callen D
    Healthtexas; 1989 May; 44(11):26-8. PubMed ID: 10318239
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 'Second opinion' surgery provisions now included in 27 BC-BS plans.
    Hospitals; 1978 Oct; 52(20):21. PubMed ID: 689630
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. N.Y. Life adds free second opinion plan.
    Bus Insur; 1979 Apr; 13(7):16. PubMed ID: 10316800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Second opinions and cost-effectiveness: the questions continue.
    Peebles RJ
    Bull Am Coll Surg; 1991 Jun; 76(6):18-25. PubMed ID: 10170735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Second surgical opinions: what have we learned?
    Galblum T
    Forum (Wash); 1980 Feb; 3(1):14-7. PubMed ID: 6988317
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Question HEW surgical opinion plan.
    J Iowa Med Soc; 1978 Jul; 68(7):238. PubMed ID: 659932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.