These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 434028)
1. Changing obstetric practices and amelioration of perinatal outcome in a university hospital. Shamsi HH; Petrie RH; Steer CM Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Apr; 133(8):855-8. PubMed ID: 434028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Obstetrics through the retrospectroscope. Savage JE South Med J; 1980 Nov; 73(11):1516-20. PubMed ID: 7444523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fetal stress and nonstress tests: an analysis and comparison of their ability to identify fetal outcome. Pratt D; Diamond F; Yen H; Bieniarz J; Burd L Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Oct; 54(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 492619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A controlled trial of fetal heart rate monitoring in a low-risk obstetric population. Wood C; Renou P; Oats J; Farrell E; Beischer N; Anderson I Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Nov; 141(5):527-34. PubMed ID: 7294080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effects of electronic fetal heart rate monitoring on perinatal outcome and obstetric practices. Mueller-Heubach E; MacDonald HM; Joret D; Portman MA; Edelstone DI; Caritis SN Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 137(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 7405966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Antepartum fetal heart rate testing. IV. The nonstress test as a primary approach. Keegan KA; Paul RH Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jan; 136(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 6444346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Central fetal monitoring: effect on perinatal outcomes and cesarean section rate. Withiam-Leitch M; Shelton J; Fleming E Birth; 2006 Dec; 33(4):284-8. PubMed ID: 17150066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrapartum fetal monitoring. Maternal and fetal morbidity and perinatal mortality. Chan WH; Paul RH; Toews J Obstet Gynecol; 1973 Jan; 41(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 4682619 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. General obstetric management of the diabetic pregnancy. Gabbe SG; Quilligan EJ Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 24(1):91-105. PubMed ID: 7011642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. An assessment of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in labor. A randomized trial. Kelso IM; Parsons RJ; Lawrence GF; Arora SS; Edmonds DK; Cooke ID Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 131(5):526-32. PubMed ID: 677195 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for fetal and neonatal risk in the postdate pregnancy. Schneider JM; Olson RW; Curet LB Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Jul; 131(5):473-8. PubMed ID: 677187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Yearly trends in caesarean section and cesarean mortality at Ile-Ife, Nigeria. Okonofua FE; Makinde ON; Ayangade SO Trop J Obstet Gynaecol; 1988; 1(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 12179273 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Postdate pregnancy: utilization of contraction stress testing for primary fetal surveillance. Freeman RK; Garite TJ; Mondanlou H; Dorchester W; Rommal C; Devaney M Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1981 May; 140(2):128-35. PubMed ID: 7234908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Experience with fetal monitoring in a university teaching hospital. Koh KS; Greves D; Yung S; Peddle LJ Can Med Assoc J; 1975 Feb; 112(4):455-6, 459-60. PubMed ID: 1111895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The influence of scalp sampling on the cesarean section rate for fetal distress. Zalar RW; Quilligan EJ Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1979 Sep; 135(2):239-46. PubMed ID: 38669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The evaluation of continuous fetal heart rate monitoring in high-risk pregnancy. Haverkamp AD; Thompson HE; McFee JG; Cetrulo C Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1976 Jun; 125(3):310-20. PubMed ID: 5895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]