These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 434903)

  • 1. Clinical evaluation and comparison of the Infrasonde, Arteriosonde, and mercury sphygmomanometer in measurement of blood pressure in children.
    Savage JM; Dillon MJ; Taylor JF
    Arch Dis Child; 1979 Mar; 54(3):184-9. PubMed ID: 434903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluating indirect blood pressure measurement techniques: a comparison of three systems in infants and children.
    Reder RF; Dimich I; Cohen ML; Steinfeld L
    Pediatrics; 1978 Sep; 62(3):326-30. PubMed ID: 704205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparisons of blood pressure measurements by auscultation and Physiometrics Infrasonde recording techniques.
    van den Berg BJ
    Hypertension; 1980; 2(4 Pt 2):I8-17. PubMed ID: 7399640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of an automatic device for arterial blood pressure determination : the Arteriosonde 1217].
    Laulhère L; Doyon B; Debru JL; Morin B; Mallion JM
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1979 Nov; 72 Spec no():120-5. PubMed ID: 119506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Observer error in systolic blood pressure measurement in the elderly. A case for automatic recorders?
    Hla KM; Vokaty KA; Feussner JR
    Arch Intern Med; 1986 Dec; 146(12):2373-6. PubMed ID: 2877645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Clinical evaluation of the Infrasonde D4000 blood pressure monitor.
    Zezulka AV; Sloan PJ; Davies P; Beevers DG
    Postgrad Med J; 1985 Apr; 61(714):321-3. PubMed ID: 4022862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulse sounds and measurement of diastolic blood pressure in children.
    Uhari M; Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Pokka T
    Lancet; 1991 Jul; 338(8760):159-61. PubMed ID: 1677074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.
    de Gaudemaris R; Folsom AR; Prineas RJ; Luepker RV
    Am J Epidemiol; 1985 Feb; 121(2):282-90. PubMed ID: 4014120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.
    O'Brien E; Mee F; Atkins N; O'Malley K
    Lancet; 1990 Dec; 336(8729):1465-8. PubMed ID: 1979092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Miniature electronic blood pressure monitor compared with a blind-reading mercury sphygmomanometer in pregnancy.
    Dawson AJ; Middlemiss C; Vanner TF
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1989 Nov; 33(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 2583339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Oscillometric finger blood pressure versus brachial auscultative blood pressure recording.
    Iyriboz Y
    J Fam Pract; 1990 Oct; 31(4):376-80. PubMed ID: 2212968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Dinamap 1846SX automated blood pressure recorder: comparison with the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer under field conditions.
    Whincup PH; Bruce NG; Cook DG; Shaper AG
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1992 Apr; 46(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 1583434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Random-zero sphygmomanometer, Rose's tape, and the accuracy of the blood pressure measurements in children.
    Nuutinen M; Turtinen J; Uhari M
    Pediatr Res; 1992 Aug; 32(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 1508618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrepancies between direct and indirect blood pressure measurements using various recommendations for arm cuff selection.
    Clark JA; Lieh-Lai MW; Sarnaik A; Mattoo TK
    Pediatrics; 2002 Nov; 110(5):920-3. PubMed ID: 12415030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of performance of various sphygmomanometers with intra-arterial blood-pressure readings.
    Hunyor SN; Flynn JM; Cochineas C
    Br Med J; 1978 Jul; 2(6131):159-62. PubMed ID: 678830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Blood pressure during pediatric anesthesia. Four methods of peroperative indirect measurement. Comparison (author's transl)].
    Ghnassia MD; Huynh KH; Rosenberg S; Delègue L
    Anesth Analg (Paris); 1980; 37(7-8):399-402. PubMed ID: 7425321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Consistency between the electronic and mercury sphygmomanometer in children and adolescents on blood pressure measuring].
    Cao Q; Li D; Yu W; Guo Q; Zhao L; Yu D; Wang Y
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2016 Sep; 45(5):758-765. PubMed ID: 29903127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Validation of portable noninvasive blood pressure monitoring devices: comparisons with intra-arterial and sphygmomanometer measurements.
    Graettinger WF; Lipson JL; Cheung DG; Weber MA
    Am Heart J; 1988 Oct; 116(4):1155-60. PubMed ID: 3177191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of three oscillometric blood pressure devices against auscultatory mercury sphygmomanometer in children.
    Wong SN; Tz Sung RY; Leung LC
    Blood Press Monit; 2006 Oct; 11(5):281-91. PubMed ID: 16932037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of sequential same arm agreement of blood pressure measurements by a CVProfilor DO-2020 versus a Baumanometer mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Prisant LM; Resnick LM; Hollenberg SM
    Blood Press Monit; 2001 Jun; 6(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 11518838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.