These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 434903)

  • 21. Clinical experience with use of ultrasound sphygmomanometer.
    George CF; Lewis PJ; Petrie A
    Br Heart J; 1975 Aug; 37(8):804-7. PubMed ID: 1103909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparison of the Sphygmetrics SR-2 Automatic Blood Pressure Recorder to the mercury sphygmomanometer in population studies.
    Fortmann SP; Marcuson R; Bitter PH; Haskell WL
    Am J Epidemiol; 1981 Dec; 114(6):836-44. PubMed ID: 7315832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Doppler ultrasound to measure systolic and diastolic blood pressures in infants and young children.
    Whyte RK; Elseed AM; Fraser CB; Shinebourne EA; de Swiet M
    Arch Dis Child; 1975 Jul; 50(7):542-4. PubMed ID: 1167067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of auscultatory and oscillometric BP measurements in children with obesity and their effect on the diagnosis of arterial hypertension.
    Fonseca-Reyes S; Romero-Velarde E; Torres-Gudiño E; Illescas-Zarate D; Forsyth-MacQuarrie AM
    Arch Cardiol Mex; 2018; 88(1):16-24. PubMed ID: 28238543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Automated blood pressure reading--its claims and its reliability.
    Ho TF; Yip WC; Tay JS
    Ann Acad Med Singap; 1983 Oct; 12(4):606-8. PubMed ID: 6678140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.
    Parker D; Liu K; Dyer AR; Giumetti D; Liao YL; Stamler J
    Hypertension; 1988 Mar; 11(3):269-72. PubMed ID: 3280484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Age-based differences between mercury sphygmomanometer and pulse dynamic blood pressure measurements.
    Brinton TJ; Walls ED; Yajnik AK; Chio SS
    Blood Press Monit; 1998 Apr; 3(2):125-129. PubMed ID: 10212342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auscultatory measurement of arterial pressure during anaesthesia: a reassessment of Korotkoff sounds.
    Pereira E; Prys-Roberts C; Dagnino J; Anger C; Cooper GM; Hutton P
    Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1985 Mar; 2(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 4018039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Properties of the random zero sphygmomanometer.
    Kronmal RA; Rutan GH; Manolio TA; Borhani NO
    Hypertension; 1993 May; 21(5):632-7. PubMed ID: 8491498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical blood pressure measurement verification when comparing a Tensoval duo control device with a mercury sphygmomanometer in patients suffering from atrial fibrillation.
    Farsky S; Benova K; Krausova D; Sirotiaková J; Vysocanova P
    Blood Press Monit; 2011 Oct; 16(5):252-7. PubMed ID: 21914986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A perfect replacement for the mercury sphygmomanometer: the case of the hybrid blood pressure monitor.
    Stergiou GS; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Destounis A; Tzamouranis D
    J Hum Hypertens; 2012 Apr; 26(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 21900952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Noninvasive determination of systolic, diastolic and end-systolic blood pressure in neonates, infants and young children: comparison with central aortic pressure measurements.
    Colan SD; Fujii A; Borow KM; MacPherson D; Sanders SP
    Am J Cardiol; 1983 Oct; 52(7):867-70. PubMed ID: 6624679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Reliability of the measurement of arterial pressure in the forearm in the obese subject].
    Warembourg A; Poncelet P; Carré A
    Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1987 Jun; 80(6):1015-9. PubMed ID: 3116964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Lack of comparability of two automated blood pressure monitors in a hypertensive population.
    Linden W; Wright JM
    Clin Invest Med; 1986; 9(2):71-5. PubMed ID: 2873912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Validation of Oscillomat, a device for self-measurement of blood pressure. Comparison with mercury sphygmomanometers].
    Asmar R; Sassano P; Demolis P; Ménard J; Safar M
    Presse Med; 1991 Mar; 20(12):551-5. PubMed ID: 1827894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the arterial blood pressure of dogs by two noninvasive methods.
    Chalifoux A; Dallaire A; Blais D; Larivière N; Pelletier N
    Can J Comp Med; 1985 Oct; 49(4):419-23. PubMed ID: 4075242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Determination of diastolic arterial pressure in children: fourth or fifth phase of Korotkoff's sounds?].
    Velásquez-Jones L
    Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex; 1984 Feb; 41(2):65-7. PubMed ID: 6704224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Clinical comparison of automated auscultatory and oscillometric and catheter-transducer measurements of arterial pressure.
    Davis RF
    J Clin Monit; 1985 Apr; 1(2):114-9. PubMed ID: 3831250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Can electronic sphygmomanometers be used for measurement of blood pressure at high altitudes?
    Li S; Zhao X; Ba S; He F; Lam CT; Ke L; Li N; Yan LL; Li X; Wu Y
    Blood Press Monit; 2012 Apr; 17(2):62-8. PubMed ID: 22343751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Comparison between brachial blood pressures obtained by aneroid sphygmomanometer and central aortic pressures: factors affecting the measurements].
    Kayrak M; Ulgen MS; Yazici M; Demir K; Doğan Y; Koç F; Zengin K; Ari H
    Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars; 2008 Jun; 36(4):239-46. PubMed ID: 18765967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.