These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

178 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 434903)

  • 41. Automated sphygmomanometer in spinal cord injured patients during head-up tilt: an evaluation.
    Hammond MC; Hinde JD; Rida W
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1987 Jul; 68(7):430-3. PubMed ID: 3606366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Wideband external pulse recording during cuff deflation: a new technique for evaluation of the arterial pressure pulse and measurement of blood pressure.
    Blank SG; West JE; Müller FB; Cody RJ; Harshfield GA; Pecker MS; Laragh JH; Pickering TG
    Circulation; 1988 Jun; 77(6):1297-305. PubMed ID: 3370770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. High-fidelity digital recording and playback sphygmomanometry system: device description and proof of concept.
    Lee J; Chee Y; Kim I; Karpettas N; Kollias A; Atkins N; Stergiou GS; O'Brien E
    Blood Press Monit; 2015 Oct; 20(5):266-72. PubMed ID: 26075332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Mean blood pressure among the adults in China 2010-2012: based on the results of mercury sphygmomanometer and converted electronic sphygmomanometer].
    Yu DM; Fu P; Yu WT; Guo HJ; Yang XG; Zhao WH; Zhao LY
    Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Oct; 51(10):933-938. PubMed ID: 29036997
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Systolic hypertension. Direct and indirect BP measurements.
    Vardan S; Mookherjee S; Warner R; Smulyan H
    Arch Intern Med; 1983 May; 143(5):935-8. PubMed ID: 6679238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Influencing factors on indirect measurement of blood pressure in children.
    Okahata S; Kamiya T
    Jpn Circ J; 1987 Dec; 51(12):1400-3. PubMed ID: 3443995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of a new non-invasive semiautomatic blood pressure monitoring device.
    Fukuoka M; Yamori Y; Ueno T; Kodama S; Parati G; Pomidossi G; Mancia G; Zanchetti A
    Clin Exp Hypertens A; 1987; 9(1):141-52. PubMed ID: 3581485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. [The evaluation of a self-measurement arterial pressure monitor: the OMRON-HM 722C].
    Córdoba R; Fuertes MI; Alvarez A; Molina I; Solans R; Melero I
    Aten Primaria; 1997 Sep; 20(5):247-50. PubMed ID: 9453774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. An evaluation of two indirect methods of blood pressure measurement in ill patients.
    Rebenson-Piano M; Holm K; Foreman MD; Kirchhoff KT
    Nurs Res; 1989; 38(1):42-5. PubMed ID: 2911511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Evaluation of an automatic device for measurement of the indirect systolic and diastolic blood pressure, arteriosonde 1217.
    Gundersen J; Ahlgren I
    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand; 1973; 17(3):203-7. PubMed ID: 4754121
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Blood pressure randomized methodology study comparing automatic oscillometric and mercury sphygmomanometer devices: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2009-2010.
    Ostchega Y; Zhang G; Sorlie P; Hughes JP; Reed-Gillette DS; Nwankwo T; Yoon S
    Natl Health Stat Report; 2012 Oct; (59):1-15. PubMed ID: 24984529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Comparison of the automatic sphygmo-oscillographic and auscultation methods of blood pressure measurements].
    Sapiński A; Swidzińska S; Sapiński F
    Kardiol Pol; 1991; 34(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 2051710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical validation of aneroid sphygmomanometer.
    Saxena Y; Saxena V; Gupta R
    Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2012; 56(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23734440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. In-use comparison of blood pressure measurements from an automated blood pressure instrument with those from a mercury sphygmomanometer.
    Gupta P; Mittal L; Rizzo RA; Bikkina M; DeBari VA
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2009; 43(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 19480489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A comparative study of automated blood pressure recorders.
    Rubin P; McLean K; Reid J
    Postgrad Med J; 1980 Dec; 56(662):815-7. PubMed ID: 7267490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Korotkoff sounds in neonates, infants, and toddlers.
    Knecht KR; Seller JD; Alpert BS
    Am J Cardiol; 2009 Apr; 103(8):1165-7. PubMed ID: 19361608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Measuring blood pressure in pregnant women: a comparison of direct and indirect methods.
    Brown MA; Reiter L; Smith B; Buddle ML; Morris R; Whitworth JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1994 Sep; 171(3):661-7. PubMed ID: 8092212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. [Comparative study on electronic sphygmomanometer and mercury sphygmomanometer among adults in the field study].
    Yu D; Li D; Guo Q; Yu W; Xu X; Zhao L
    Wei Sheng Yan Jiu; 2015 Nov; 44(6):914-7. PubMed ID: 26738382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. The Elag-Koln automatic blood pressure recorder. A clinical appraisal.
    Ramsay LE; Nicholls MG; Boyle P
    Br Heart J; 1977 Jul; 39(7):795-8. PubMed ID: 884029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Does the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer underestimate blood pressure, and by how much?
    Mackie A; Whincup P; McKinnon M
    J Hum Hypertens; 1995 May; 9(5):337-43. PubMed ID: 7623370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.