106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 435176)
1. Performance of high frequency impaired listeners with conventional and extended high frequency amplification.
Schwartz DM; Surr RK; Montgomery AA; Prosek RA; Walden BE
Audiology; 1979; 18(2):157-74. PubMed ID: 435176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of reducing low-frequency amplification on consonant perception in quiet and noise.
Gordon-Salant S
J Speech Hear Res; 1984 Dec; 27(4):483-93. PubMed ID: 6521454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of Different Hearing Aid Prescriptions for Children.
Marriage JE; Vickers DA; Baer T; Glasberg BR; Moore BCJ
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(1):20-31. PubMed ID: 28691934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Word recognition for temporally and spectrally distorted materials: the effects of age and hearing loss.
Smith SL; Pichora-Fuller MK; Wilson RH; Macdonald EN
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(3):349-66. PubMed ID: 22343546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluating performance with high-frequency emphasis amplification.
Lee LW; Humes LE; Wilde G
J Am Acad Audiol; 1993 Mar; 4(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 8471790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Listeners who prefer monaural to binaural hearing aids.
Carter AS; Noe CM; Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 May; 12(5):261-72. PubMed ID: 11392438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of training on word-recognition performance in noise for young normal-hearing and older hearing-impaired listeners.
Burk MH; Humes LE; Amos NE; Strauser LE
Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):263-78. PubMed ID: 16672795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of frequency compression hearing aids for unilaterally implanted children with acoustically amplified residual hearing in the nonimplanted ear.
Park LR; Teagle HF; Buss E; Roush PA; Buchman CA
Ear Hear; 2012; 33(4):e1-e12. PubMed ID: 22531574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Enhancement of Consonant Recognition in Bimodal and Normal Hearing Listeners.
Yoon YS; Riley B; Patel H; Frost A; Fillmore P; Gifford R; Hansen J
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2019 Jun; 128(6_suppl):139S-145S. PubMed ID: 31092038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of extended-range frequency-response amplification in hearing aids.
Forrester JI; Raffin MJ
J Aud Res; 1982 Jan; 22(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 7187908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Speech perception with combined electric-acoustic stimulation and bilateral cochlear implants in a multisource noise field.
Rader T; Fastl H; Baumann U
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):324-32. PubMed ID: 23263408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of Simulated Hearing Loss on Bilingual Children's Consonant Recognition in Noise.
Nishi K; Trevino AC; Rosado Rogers L; García P; Neely ST
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(5):e292-e304. PubMed ID: 28353522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phoneme recognition in modulated maskers by normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners.
Phatak SA; Grant KW
J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1646-54. PubMed ID: 22978893
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of extended high frequency bandwidth in osseointegrated bone conduction device users.
Snapp HA; Kuzbyt B
Hear Res; 2022 Aug; 421():108379. PubMed ID: 34756677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of Expanding Envelope Fluctuations on Consonant Perception in Hearing-Impaired Listeners.
Wiinberg A; Zaar J; Dau T
Trends Hear; 2018; 22():2331216518775293. PubMed ID: 29756553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Factors Predicting Postoperative Unilateral and Bilateral Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients with Acoustic Hearing.
Plant K; McDermott H; van Hoesel R; Dawson P; Cowan R
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 26462170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
