These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 437066)

  • 1. Circumplex model of marital and family systems: III. Empirical evaluation with families.
    Russell CS
    Fam Process; 1979 Mar; 18(1):29-45. PubMed ID: 437066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Circumplex model of marital and family system: I. Cohesion and adaptability dimensions, family types, and clinical applications.
    Olson DH; Sprenkle DH; Russell CS
    Fam Process; 1979 Mar; 18(1):3-28. PubMed ID: 437067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A test of the Circumplex Model of Marital and Family Systems using the Clinical Rating Scale.
    Thomas V; Ozechowski TJ
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2000 Oct; 26(4):523-34. PubMed ID: 11042844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Beavers-Timberlawn model of family competence and the circumplex model of family adaptability and cohesion: separate, but equal?
    Green RG; Kolevzon MS; Vosler NR
    Fam Process; 1985 Sep; 24(3):385-408. PubMed ID: 4043354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Beyond the Circumplex model: I. A moratorium on curvilinearity.
    Cluff RB; Hicks MW; Madsen CH
    Fam Process; 1994 Dec; 33(4):455-70. PubMed ID: 7698308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating FACES III and the Circumplex Model: 2,440 families.
    Green RG; Harris RN; Forte JA; Robinson M
    Fam Process; 1991 Mar; 30(1):55-73. PubMed ID: 2044751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Women with breast cancer: perception of family functioning and adjustment to illness.
    Friedman LC; Baer PE; Nelson DV; Lane M; Smith FE; Dworkin RJ
    Psychosom Med; 1988; 50(5):529-40. PubMed ID: 3186896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the Family Adaptability and Cohesion Evaluation Scales and the Circumplex Model.
    Rodick JD; Henggeler SW; Hanson CL
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1986 Mar; 14(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 3950223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Self-reports of differentiation of self and marital compatibility as related to family functioning in the third and fourth stages of the family life cycle.
    Richards E
    Sch Inq Nurs Pract; 1989; 3(3):163-78; discussion 177-80. PubMed ID: 2595147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A test of the Olson Circumplex Model: examining its curvilinear assumption and the presence of extreme types.
    Anderson SA; Gavazzi SM
    Fam Process; 1990 Sep; 29(3):309-24. PubMed ID: 2209833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Functional illness and family functioning: a comparison of healthy and somaticizing adolescents.
    Walker LS; McLaughlin FJ; Greene JW
    Fam Process; 1988 Sep; 27(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 3224702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theories of family adaptability: toward a synthesis of Olson's Circumplex and the Beavers systems models.
    Lee C
    Fam Process; 1988 Mar; 27(1):73-96. PubMed ID: 3360099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Circumplex Model VII: validation studies and FACES III.
    Olson DH
    Fam Process; 1986 Sep; 25(3):337-51. PubMed ID: 3758310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship between Family Adaptability, Cohesion and Adolescent Problem Behaviors: Curvilinearity of Circumplex Model.
    Joh JY; Kim S; Park JL; Kim YP
    Korean J Fam Med; 2013 May; 34(3):169-77. PubMed ID: 23730484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An examination of family functioning utilizing the circumplex model in psychiatrically hospitalized children with depression.
    Kashani JH; Allan WD; Dahlmeier JM; Rezvani M; Reid JC
    J Affect Disord; 1995 Oct; 35(1-2):65-73. PubMed ID: 8557889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. FACES IV and the Circumplex Model: validation study.
    Olson D
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2011 Jan; 37(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 21198689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Families of adolescent drug abusers are "rigid": are these families either "disengaged" or "enmeshed," or both?
    Friedman AS; Utada A; Morrissey MR
    Fam Process; 1987 Mar; 26(1):131-48. PubMed ID: 3569500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A psychometric study of the family adaptability and cohesion evaluation scales.
    Alexander BB; Johnson SB; Carter RL
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1984 Jun; 12(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 6725781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical investigation of interaction and relationship patterns in functional and dysfunctional nuclear families and stepfamilies.
    Anderson JZ; White GD
    Fam Process; 1986 Sep; 25(3):407-22. PubMed ID: 3758315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Too close and too rigid: applying the Circumplex Model of Family Systems to first-generation family firms.
    Michael-Tsabari N; Lavee Y
    J Marital Fam Ther; 2012 Jun; 38 Suppl 1():105-16. PubMed ID: 22765328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.