These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 437162)

  • 21. Factors influencing the success of salpingostomy techniques for distal fimbrial obstruction.
    Rock JA; Katayama KP; Martin EJ; Woodruff JD; Jones HW
    Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Nov; 52(5):591-6. PubMed ID: 724178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Infertility surgery of the oviduct.
    Grant A
    Fertil Steril; 1971 Aug; 22(8):496-503. PubMed ID: 5110232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Microsurgery of the fallopian tube: from fantasy to reality.
    Winston RM
    Fertil Steril; 1980 Dec; 34(6):521-30. PubMed ID: 7004914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The prevention of postoperative pelvic adhesions following conservative operative treatment for human infertility. A final 3-year follow-up report.
    Horne HW; Clyman M; Debrovner C; Griggs G; Kistner R; Kosasa T; Stevenson CS; Taymor M
    Int J Fertil; 1973; 18(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 4353917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Technics of the use of CO2 laser in microsurgery of sterility. Experimental study. Clinical results].
    Lefebvre G; Foulot H; Jagueux M
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1986; 15(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 3090132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Prevention of postoperative tubal adhesions. Comparative study of commonly used agents.
    DiZerega GS; Hodger GD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Jan; 136(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 6766273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. [Related factors associated with pelvic adhesion and its influence on fallopian tube recanalization in infertile patients].
    Hou HY; Chen YQ; Chen X; Hu CX; Yang ZH; Chen J; Kong XL
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 47(11):823-8. PubMed ID: 23302122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Surgical correction of female infertility. An analysis of results and failures in 101 cases.
    Fredricsson B; Rosenborg L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1986; 65(5):421-5. PubMed ID: 2946137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Possibilities of reconstructive tubal surgery].
    Swolin K
    Wien Med Wochenschr; 1984 Sep; 134(17):393-6. PubMed ID: 6495751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Adhesion formation after tubal surgery: results of the eighth-day laparoscopy in 188 patients.
    Trimbos-Kemper TC; Trimbos JB; van Hall EV
    Fertil Steril; 1985 Mar; 43(3):395-400. PubMed ID: 3156771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Experience with 143 cases of tubal surgery.
    Wallach EE; Manara LR; Eisenberg E
    Fertil Steril; 1983 May; 39(5):609-17. PubMed ID: 6840302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Microsurgical reconstructive operations in tubo-peritoneal infertility].
    Krylov VS; Strizhakov AN; Milanov NO; Iakubovich DV; Gynga VN
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1985 Aug; (9):39-42. PubMed ID: 2933980
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Results of microsurgical reconstruction in patients with combined proximal and distal tubal occlusion: double obstruction.
    Patton PE; Williams TJ; Coulam CB
    Fertil Steril; 1987 Oct; 48(4):670-4. PubMed ID: 2958367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Causes of failed reconstructive tubal microsurgery.
    Gomel V
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Jun; 24(6):239-43. PubMed ID: 7420326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Previous ectopic pregnancy should be considered a contraindication for microsurgery.
    Strandell A; Thorburn J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 1996 Apr; 75(4):394-9. PubMed ID: 8638463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [The current status of microsurgical sterility operations in the treatment of tubal sterility].
    Freude G; Leodolter S
    Gynakol Rundsch; 1989; 29 Suppl 2():300-3. PubMed ID: 2613033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An analysis of the outcome of microsurgical and laparoscopic adhesiolysis for infertility.
    Saravelos HG; Li TC; Cooke ID
    Hum Reprod; 1995 Nov; 10(11):2887-94. PubMed ID: 8747038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Prognostic elements in surgery for tubal sterility].
    Revaz C; Noyer A
    Gynaecologia; 1969; 167(5):332-6. PubMed ID: 5802908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Role of dextran 70 in microtubal surgery.
    Utian WH; Goldfarb JM; Starks GC
    Fertil Steril; 1979 Jan; 31(1):79-82. PubMed ID: 421920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Foreign body granulomas in peritubal and periovarian adhesions: a possible cause for unsuccessful reconstructive surgery in infertility.
    Yaffe H; Beyth Y; Reinhartz T; Levij IS
    Fertil Steril; 1980 Mar; 33(3):277-9. PubMed ID: 6988232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.