These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 437549)

  • 1. [Evaluation of electrical impedance and its components in prolonged pregnancy in the aspect of early detection of fetal distress].
    Turowski J
    Ginekol Pol; 1979 Mar; 50(3):271-3. PubMed ID: 437549
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predicting fetal distress.
    Bruinse HW; Reuwer PJ
    Indian J Pediatr; 1989; 56(4):451-4. PubMed ID: 2633988
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Identification, assessment and management of fetal compromise.
    Walton JR; Peaceman AM
    Clin Perinatol; 2012 Dec; 39(4):753-68. PubMed ID: 23164176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Current possibilities of diagnosis of twisting of the umbilical cord around the fetus' body].
    Grishchenko VI; Efimova GS
    Akush Ginekol (Mosk); 1984 Oct; (10):75-9. PubMed ID: 6393783
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A case study of antenatal distress and consequent neonatal respiratory distress.
    Uebel P
    Neonatal Netw; 1999 Aug; 18(5):67-70. PubMed ID: 10693480
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The rationale for antepartum fetal heart rate monitoring.
    Schifrin BS
    J Reprod Med; 1979 Nov; 23(5):213-21. PubMed ID: 513046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Cardiotocographic monitoring of the fetus in pregnancy complicated by hypertension].
    Moneta E; Militello G; Romanini C; Oliva GC; Bompiani A
    Minerva Ginecol; 1978; 30(1-2):13-25. PubMed ID: 643234
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Effect of an acoustic stimulus on the reactivity of a fetus in distress (a preliminary report)].
    Uzunova N; Todorova R; Petrova N; Konstantinova T
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1987; 26(1):30-2. PubMed ID: 3592106
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The fetal monitoring polemic.
    Schifrin BS
    Clin Perinatol; 1982 Jun; 9(2):399-408. PubMed ID: 6749379
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Doppler study of the blood flow rate in the umbilical artery as an index of fetal status].
    Pelev Zh; Atanasova Ts; Komitov G
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1988; 27(4):83-5. PubMed ID: 3064619
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Suspect diagnoses come with biophysical profiling.
    Lemay G
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2004; (69):56-7. PubMed ID: 15124328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The use of fetal kick charts.
    Fardy HJ
    Aust Fam Physician; 1990 Oct; 19(10):1565-7. PubMed ID: 2248568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Summary of national symposium on fetal monitoring].
    Pan W; Huang X
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2000 Jan; 35(1):11-3. PubMed ID: 12790101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical usefulness of a model for the evaluation of antepartal cardiotocograms (proceedings)].
    Brandt H; Schulenburg W; Stude I; Fischer WM
    Arch Gynakol; 1977 Jul; 224(1-4):147-8. PubMed ID: 579760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Significance of composite scoring of biochemical monitoring in fetal distress].
    Zhu FQ
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1991 May; 26(3):136-9, 187. PubMed ID: 1874054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Experiences with Fischer's evaluation model for antepartal cardiotocograms (proceedings)].
    Jordan B; Hoheisel M
    Arch Gynakol; 1977 Jul; 224(1-4):148-9. PubMed ID: 579761
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sonographic biophysical profile in the postdate pregnancy.
    Hann L; McArdle C; Sachs B
    J Ultrasound Med; 1987 Apr; 6(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 3295284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Improved outcome of twice weekly nonstress testing.
    Boehm FH; Salyer S; Shah DM; Vaughn WK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Apr; 67(4):566-8. PubMed ID: 3960430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Current means of fetal monitoring. The concept of chronic fetal distress].
    Treisser A; Sureau C
    Rev Prat; 1981 Jan; 31(5):329-30, 333-6, 339-41. PubMed ID: 7466259
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The predictive value of adjunctive NST and AST in high-risk pregnancies.
    Salamalekis E; Loghis C; Papoulias I
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1996 Dec; 55(3):295-6. PubMed ID: 9003957
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.