These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4385216)

  • 1. Perception of and reaction to ambiguity by repressors and sensitizers: a construct-validity study.
    Dublin JE
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1968 Apr; 32(2):198-205. PubMed ID: 4385216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Elicitation of information and response biases of repressors, sensitizers, and neutrals in behavior prediction.
    Kaplan MF
    J Pers; 1968 Mar; 36(1):84-91. PubMed ID: 5642211
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auditory perceptual thresholds for sensitizers, defensive and nondefensive repressors.
    Schill T; Althoff M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Dec; 27(3):935-8. PubMed ID: 5720395
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of avoidance and vigilance by repressors and sensitizers.
    Hoffman HE
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1970 Feb; 34(1):91-6. PubMed ID: 5436471
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impersonal and personal language patterns of repressors and sensitizers.
    Brodsky SL; Dixon JC
    J Gen Psychol; 1968 Jan; 78(1st Half):27-33. PubMed ID: 4383946
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Repression-sensitization and psychological defenses.
    Hirsch CL; Dana RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Aug; 27(1):32. PubMed ID: 5685710
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Simulation of normal MMPI profiles by repressors and sensitizers.
    Merbaum M
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1972 Aug; 39(1):171. PubMed ID: 4402975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An extension of the construct validity of the Holtzman inkblot technique.
    MOSELEY EC; DUFFEY RF; SHERMAN LJ
    J Clin Psychol; 1963 Apr; 19():186-92. PubMed ID: 13936120
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. ATTRIBUTION OF HOSTILITY TO SELF AND OTHERS BY EXPRESSORS, SENSITIZERS, AND REPRESSORS.
    ALTROCCHI J; SHRAUGER S; MCLEOD MA
    J Clin Psychol; 1964 Apr; 20():233. PubMed ID: 14140085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of repression-sensitization scores obtained by two different methods.
    Simmons AD
    J Clin Psychol; 1966 Oct; 22(4):465. PubMed ID: 4381924
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repressors and sensitizers as described by themselves and their peers.
    Lomont JF
    J Pers; 1966 Jun; 34(2):224-40. PubMed ID: 5939214
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Measurement of personality and attitude: applications to clinical research.
    Marks I
    Postgrad Med J; 1968 Apr; 44(510):277-85. PubMed ID: 4385138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structured personality tests and dissimulation.
    Goldberg PA; Miller SJ
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1966 Oct; 30(5):452-5. PubMed ID: 4382033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Relationship of defense mechanisms to field dependence-independence.
    Ihilevich D; Gleser GC
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1971 Jun; 77(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 4933897
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Discussion patterns of homogeneous groups of repressers and sensitizers following success and failure.
    Carrera RN; Cohen AM
    Psychol Rep; 1968 Feb; 22(1):7-14. PubMed ID: 4384433
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Defensive style and esthtic distortion.
    Machotka P
    J Pers; 1967 Dec; 35(4):600-22. PubMed ID: 4383954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MMPI findings in field-dependent and field-independent subjects.
    Adevai G; Silverman AJ; Mc Gough WE
    Percept Mot Skills; 1968 Feb; 26(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 4384463
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Relationship of manifest anxiety to repression-sensitization on the MMPI.
    Sullivan PF; Roberts LK
    J Consult Clin Psychol; 1969 Dec; 33(6):763-4. PubMed ID: 4391140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Ego defense and aesthetic distortion: experimenter effects.
    Machotka P
    J Pers; 1970 Dec; 38(4):560-80. PubMed ID: 4394910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. THE EFFECTS OF SUBJECT-AND EXPERIMENTER-INDUCED DEFENSIVE RESPONSE SETS ON PICTURE-FRUSTRATION TEST REACTIONS.
    SCHWARTZ MM; COHEN BD; PAVLIK WB
    J Proj Tech Pers Assess; 1964 Sep; 28():341-5. PubMed ID: 14210884
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.