These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

61 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4387412)

  • 1. A computer model for the perception of syntactic structure.
    Thorne JP
    Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1968 Dec; 171(1024):377-86. PubMed ID: 4387412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pause perception in a speech-like signal].
    Ventsov AV; Vinnichuk MG
    Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 May; 67(5):720-4. PubMed ID: 7286308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computer as a research tool in speech-understanding systems research.
    Reddy DR
    Fed Proc; 1974 Dec; 33(12):2347-51. PubMed ID: 4435235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cognition, computers, and mental models.
    Johnson-Laird PN
    Cognition; 1981; 10(1-3):139-43. PubMed ID: 7198528
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer recognition of connected speech.
    Reddy DR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1967 Aug; 42(2):329-47. PubMed ID: 6075932
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aural perception of different syntactic structures and lengths.
    Compton AJ
    Lang Speech; 1967; 10(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 6047017
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Living through a computer voice: a personal account.
    Martin A; Newell C
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2013 Oct; 38(3):96-104. PubMed ID: 23841537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Perception of visible speech: influence of spatial quantization.
    Campbell CS; Massaro DW
    Perception; 1997; 26(5):627-44. PubMed ID: 9488886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Theoretical contributions of tests on animals to the special-mechanisms debate in speech.
    Kuhl PK
    Exp Biol; 1986; 45(3):233-65. PubMed ID: 3525222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Impairments of speech production and speech perception in aphasia.
    Blumstein SE
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 1994 Oct; 346(1315):29-36. PubMed ID: 7886150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Error monitoring in speech production: a computational test of the perceptual loop theory.
    Hartsuiker RJ; Kolk HH
    Cogn Psychol; 2001 Mar; 42(2):113-57. PubMed ID: 11259106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Feature-testing models and their application to perception and memory for speech.
    Smith PT
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 25(4):511-34. PubMed ID: 4767534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of an individual speech pattern from dyadic interaction.
    Jaffe J; Breskin S
    Percept Mot Skills; 1970 Apr; 30(2):363-8. PubMed ID: 5454045
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Syntactic structure modifies attention during speech perception and recognition.
    Abrams K; Bever TG
    Q J Exp Psychol; 1969 Aug; 21(3):280-90. PubMed ID: 5347013
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The representation of lexical-syntactic information: evidence from syntactic and lexical retrieval impairments in aphasia.
    Biran M; Friedmann N
    Cortex; 2012 Oct; 48(9):1103-27. PubMed ID: 21798529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perception of musical rhythm and metre.
    Steedman MJ
    Perception; 1977; 6(5):555-69. PubMed ID: 593789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sex differences in persuadability of human and computer-synthesized speech: meta-analysis of seven studies.
    Stern SE; Mullennix JW
    Psychol Rep; 2004 Jun; 94(3 Pt 2):1283-92. PubMed ID: 15362406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Discrimination of computer-synthesized speech.
    Oshrin SE; Siders JA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1984 Oct; 59(2):619-22. PubMed ID: 6240020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Models and mechanisms in speech perception. Species comparisons provide further contributions.
    Kuhl PK
    Brain Behav Evol; 1979; 16(5-6):374-408. PubMed ID: 399202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Computer experience and computer attitude: a model to predict the use of computerised information systems.
    Yaghmaie F; Jayasuriya R; Rawstorne P
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 1998; 52 Pt 2():895-9. PubMed ID: 10384588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.