339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4390907)
21. [Are perserverations explained by brain damage?].
Breidt R
Psychiatr Clin (Basel); 1973; 6(6):357-69. PubMed ID: 4777589
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Differential psychopathological diagnosis and test psychology].
Hannemann E
Landarzt; 1967 Nov; 43(32):1558-64. PubMed ID: 5594626
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A validation of MMPI scale pairs in psychiatric diagnosis.
TAULBEE ES
J Clin Psychol; 1958 Jul; 14(3):316. PubMed ID: 13549629
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Concurrence of psychiatric diagnosis and psychological diagnosis based on the MMPI.
Ritter DR
J Pers Assess; 1974 Feb; 38(1):52-4. PubMed ID: 4149987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. The Goldberg rules in the detection of MMPI codebook modal diagnoses.
Nichols DS
J Clin Psychol; 1974 Apr; 30(2):186-8. PubMed ID: 4155707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Validity of diagnostic judgment as a function of amount of test information.
Hunt WA; Walker RE
J Clin Psychol; 1966 Apr; 22(2):154-5. PubMed ID: 5937037
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Separation of brain-damaged from psychiatric patients with ability and personality measures.
Watson CG; Gasser B; Schaefer A; Buranen C; Wold J
J Clin Psychol; 1981 Apr; 37(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 7229070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Diagnostic utility of WISC digits forward and backward.
Winne JF; Schoonover SM
Psychol Rep; 1976 Aug; 39(1):264-6. PubMed ID: 959453
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Memory-for-Designs performance of brain-damaged and non-damaged psychiatric patients.
McManis DL
Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):847-52. PubMed ID: 4842441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. PERSONALITY CHANGES AFTER SENSORY DEPRIVATION.
COOPER GD; ADAMS HB; COHEN LD
J Nerv Ment Dis; 1965 Feb; 140():103-18. PubMed ID: 14300213
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Projective test data from two contrasted groups of exhibitionists.
Wagner EE
Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):131-40. PubMed ID: 4606951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Personality assessment and test interpretation of Mexican Americans: a critique.
Padilla AM; Ruiz RA
J Pers Assess; 1975 Apr; 39(2):103-9. PubMed ID: 1097629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Organic Integrity Test (OIT) in monitoring drug effects.
Tien HC
Psychosomatics; 1970; 11(5):445-55. PubMed ID: 5470671
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [The significance of psychological testing procedures in psychiatric diagnosis].
Vatankhah H
Psychiatr Neurol (Basel); 1966; 151(2):102-13. PubMed ID: 5959044
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The peabody picture vocabulary test: automated application in a statewide psychiatric system.
Ernhart CB
Psychiatr Q; 1968; 42(2):Suppl:317-20. PubMed ID: 4394018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. [Using projective tests in forensic psychiatry may lead to wrong conclusions. Only empirically tested tests should be used].
Trygg L; Dåderman AM; Wiklund N; Meurling AW; Lindgren M; Lidberg L; Levander S
Lakartidningen; 2001 Jun; 98(26-27):3118-23. PubMed ID: 11478205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The current status of computer interpretation of psychological tests.
Fowler RD
Am J Psychiatry; 1969 Jan; 125(7):Suppl:21-7. PubMed ID: 4387928
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Perceptual field dependence and psychopathology: replication and critique.
Vardy M; Greenstein M
Percept Mot Skills; 1972 Apr; 34(2):635-42. PubMed ID: 5021815
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. GSR, CLINICAL STATE AND PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS.
GILBERSTADT H; MALEY M
J Clin Psychol; 1965 Jul; 21():235-8. PubMed ID: 14332171
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Rorschach anatomy response correlates in rehabilitation failure subjects.
Carnes GD; Bates RE
J Pers Assess; 1971 Dec; 35(6):527-37. PubMed ID: 4400419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
