These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4394018)
1. The peabody picture vocabulary test: automated application in a statewide psychiatric system. Ernhart CB Psychiatr Q; 1968; 42(2):Suppl:317-20. PubMed ID: 4394018 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Psychiatric diagnosis: a review of research. Frank GH J Gen Psychol; 1969 Oct; 81(2d Half):157-76. PubMed ID: 4390907 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated vs. clinical administration of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test and the Coloured Progressive Matrices. Knights RM; Richardson DH; McNarry LR Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Sep; 78(2):223-5. PubMed ID: 4769576 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Face test. New drawing pattern (problems of projective test in psychiatric diagnosis)]. Brade J Samml Zwangl Abh Geb Psychiatr Neurol; 1973; 43():1-130. PubMed ID: 4585374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. On the nature of borderline psychopathology: a review. Frank GH J Gen Psychol; 1970 Jul; 83(1st Half):61-77. PubMed ID: 4915773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Missouri automated psychiatric history for relatives and other informants. Eaton ME; Altman H; Schuff S; Sletten I Dis Nerv Syst; 1970 Mar; 31(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 5441095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Using an automated data system for planning and delivery of services. Sletten IW Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1974 Feb; 25(2):83-5. PubMed ID: 4812609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparability of three picture vocabulary tests with retarded school children. Silverstein AB; Hill TV Train Sch Bull (Vinel); 1967 Aug; 64(2):58-61. PubMed ID: 4866061 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Using projective tests in forensic psychiatry may lead to wrong conclusions. Only empirically tested tests should be used]. Trygg L; Dåderman AM; Wiklund N; Meurling AW; Lindgren M; Lidberg L; Levander S Lakartidningen; 2001 Jun; 98(26-27):3118-23. PubMed ID: 11478205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The current status of computer interpretation of psychological tests. Fowler RD Am J Psychiatry; 1969 Jan; 125(7):Suppl:21-7. PubMed ID: 4387928 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. COMPARISON OF COMPUTER-DERIVED PERSONALITY PROFILE AND PROJECTIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL TEST FINDINGS. GLUECK BC; REZNIKOFF M Am J Psychiatry; 1965 Jun; 121():1156-61. PubMed ID: 14286048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Relationships among Wechsler adult intelligence scale, Goodenough-Harris, and Peabody picture vocabulary tests with institutionalized retarded adults. Wells DG; Pedrini DT Percept Mot Skills; 1971 Aug; 33(1):227-32. PubMed ID: 4937871 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. A note on possible form differences in the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Gardner AM; Birnbrauer JS Am J Ment Defic; 1968 Jul; 73(1):86-7. PubMed ID: 5673511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A statewide computerized psychiatric system: demographic, diagnostic and mental status data. Sletten I; Schuff S; Altman H; Ulett G Int J Soc Psychiatry; 1972; 18(1):30-40. PubMed ID: 5045234 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MMPI measures as signs of predisposition to mental disorder among adoptees at high risk for schizophrenia. Siira V; Wahlberg KE; Miettunen J; Läksy K; Tienari P Psychiatry Res; 2008 Apr; 158(3):278-86. PubMed ID: 18272233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automated and manual intelligence testing: data on parallel forms of the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. Overton GW; Scott KG Am J Ment Defic; 1972 May; 76(6):639-43. PubMed ID: 5031084 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Data on the diagnostic value of the Magnuska test]. Littinschi G; Ciumăgeanu D; Fürtös A Neurol Psihiatr Neurochir; 1971; 16(6):521-8. PubMed ID: 4945212 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]