These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4410930)

  • 21. Modification of speech discrimination in patients with binaural asymmetrical hearing loss.
    Arkebauer HJ; Mencher GT; McCall C
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1971 May; 36(2):208-12. PubMed ID: 5087658
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Directional hearing and understanding of speech in noise uith "normal hearing" people (author's transl)].
    Platte HJ; Döring WH; Schlöndorff G
    Laryngol Rhinol Otol (Stuttg); 1978 Jul; 57(7):672-80. PubMed ID: 682785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive speech audiometry and speech discrimination space in hearing-impaired subjects.
    Stevenson PW; Martin MC
    Audiology; 1977; 16(2):110-23. PubMed ID: 849207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Reliability of monosyllabic discrimination tests in white noise for differentiating among hearing aids.
    Beattie RC; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1976 Nov; 41(4):464-76. PubMed ID: 994477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Methods for assessing high frequency hearing loss in every-day listening situations.
    Aniansson G
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1974; 320():1-50. PubMed ID: 4532460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Frequency selectivity and speech intelligibility in noise.
    Lyregaard PE
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():113-22. PubMed ID: 6955919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Audiometry: masking.
    Hamid MA; Brookler KH
    Ear Nose Throat J; 2006 Oct; 85(10):646-7. PubMed ID: 17124933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The efficacy of a multichannel hearing aid in which the gain is controlled by the minima in the temporal signal envelope.
    Festen JM; van Dijkhuizen JN; Plomp R
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():101-10. PubMed ID: 8153556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The benefits of remote microphone technology for adults with cochlear implants.
    Fitzpatrick EM; Séguin C; Schramm DR; Armstrong S; Chénier J
    Ear Hear; 2009 Oct; 30(5):590-9. PubMed ID: 19561509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Guidelines for audiometric symbols. Committee on Audiologic Evaluation. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
    ASHA Suppl; 1990 Apr; (2):25-30. PubMed ID: 1970250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Speech perception of noise with binary gains.
    Wang D; Kjems U; Pedersen MS; Boldt JB; Lunner T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Oct; 124(4):2303-7. PubMed ID: 19062868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Noise signal reduction in cochlear implant speech processors].
    Müller-Deile J
    HNO; 1995 Sep; 43(9):545-51. PubMed ID: 7591867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Aggravation of hearing loss (author's transl)].
    Kumpf W
    HNO; 1976 Oct; 24(10):347-50. PubMed ID: 993080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Investigations on the intelligibleness of a new record of the German Freiburg speech discrimination test].
    Plath P; Stühlen HW; Graf H; Pelzer H
    Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1973 Jun; 52(6):457-69. PubMed ID: 4734046
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Differentiation between psychogenic hearing problems and malingering deafness (author's transl)].
    Lehnhardt E
    HNO; 1974 May; 22(5):134-8. PubMed ID: 4842516
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Paired comparisons between the Classic 300 bone-anchored and conventional bone-conduction hearing aids in terms of sound quality and speech intelligibility.
    Ringdahl A; Israelsson B; Caprin L
    Br J Audiol; 1995 Dec; 29(6):299-307. PubMed ID: 8861406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Children's speech recognition scores: the Speech Intelligibility Index and proficiency factors for age and hearing level.
    Scollie SD
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):543-56. PubMed ID: 18469717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effect of masker modulation depth on speech masking release.
    Gnansia D; Jourdes V; Lorenzi C
    Hear Res; 2008 May; 239(1-2):60-8. PubMed ID: 18434049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Detection of inactivity of the auditory system in the beginning stage with the Freiburg masked speech test].
    Dieroff HG; Meissner W
    HNO; 1994 Jan; 42(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 8150675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.