These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
9. Visual half-field Stroop effects with spatial separation of words and color targets. Brown TL; Gore CL; Pearson T Brain Lang; 1998 Jun; 63(1):122-42. PubMed ID: 9642024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Figural aftereffects as optical illusions? Stadler M Am J Psychol; 1972 Sep; 85(3):351-75. PubMed ID: 4655810 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The effects of adaptation to gratings on the perceived orientation of single lines. Parker DM Q J Exp Psychol; 1973 Aug; 25(3):289-99. PubMed ID: 4807289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Individual differences and field dependence in the Pulfrich effect, a re-examination. Greenberger MD Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):713-4. PubMed ID: 4704310 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ADAPTATION AND REPULSION IN THE FIGURAL AFTER-EFFECT. WILSON J Q J Exp Psychol; 1965 Feb; 17():1-13. PubMed ID: 14255462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Motion detection in man and other animals. Richards W Bull Parenter Drug Assoc; 1971; 4(2):162-81. PubMed ID: 5000598 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Fragmentation of a prolonged, structured afterimage viewed by naive observers. Piggins DJ Am J Psychol; 1968 Jun; 81(2):272-3. PubMed ID: 5747970 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Gaze-contingent adaptation to prismatic spectacles. Pick HL; Hay JC Am J Psychol; 1966 Sep; 79(3):443-50. PubMed ID: 5968481 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Visual movement aftereffect: evidence for independent adaptation to moving target and stationary surround. Strelow ER; Day RH Vision Res; 1975 Jan; 15(1):117-21. PubMed ID: 1129958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Gaze perception: is seeing influenced by believing? Langton SR Curr Biol; 2009 Aug; 19(15):R651-3. PubMed ID: 19674548 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]