BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4411522)

  • 1. [What is the reason for non-participation in mass screening of cervix neoplasms?].
    Fortelius P; Haapoja H; Hakulinen T
    Duodecim; 1974; 90(8):597-601. PubMed ID: 4411522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The natural history of Pap test screening in a rural population.
    Rosenfeld JA
    Tenn Med; 1998 May; 91(5):179-82. PubMed ID: 9584605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Experience of a continuing mass screening programme. Screening and re-screening for cervical carcinoma in Turku.
    Grönroos M; Tyrkkö J; Järvi O; Rauramo L
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(6):470-8. PubMed ID: 4441027
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mass screening for cervical carcinoma in Finland. Organization and effect on morbidity and mortality.
    Timonen S; Nieminen U; Kauraniemi T
    Ann Chir Gynaecol Fenn; 1974; 63(2):104-12. PubMed ID: 4853102
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Participation of women in cervical cancer screening].
    Kallio M; Kauraniemi T; Nousiainen AR; Hanstén S; Rytsölä J; Heikkilä M; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 1994; 110(11):1061-7. PubMed ID: 7588113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Present status of mass screening of cancer of the uterine cervix].
    Kutsuzawa T; Moriya S; Okubo H; Sakuragi N; Ichinohe K
    Hokkaido Igaku Zasshi; 1986 Jul; 61(4):499-504. PubMed ID: 3758914
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Population screening for cervix carcinoma in the city of Rotterdam, 1st round].
    van der Lee-Bijlsma A
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1981 Dec; 125(49):2012-5. PubMed ID: 7322220
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Systematic screening for cancer of the uterine cervix (epidemiologic aspects)].
    Campion J; Flamant R
    Bull Inst Natl Sante Rech Med; 1966; 21(5):977-94. PubMed ID: 5976404
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [3d mass screening for cervix carcinoma in the testing area].
    Lammes FB
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1988 Mar; 132(11):479-80. PubMed ID: 3357553
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Differences in cervical cancer mass screening results in Greater-Helsinki area].
    Nieminen P; Tarkkanen J; Timonen T; Meyer B; Hakama M; Anttila A
    Duodecim; 2000; 116(22):2489-96. PubMed ID: 12053343
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Importance of cancer of the cervix in Cataluña: considerations on an eventual screening program].
    Spagnolo de la Torre E; Segura Benedicto A; Vila Macau R; Andrés Martínez J; Sans Menéndez S
    Med Clin (Barc); 1984 Jan; 82(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6708615
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Systematic screening for cervix uteri cancer in the hospital].
    Chabert P
    Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1971; 66(11):647-9. PubMed ID: 5148538
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mass screening for cervical cancer in a high risk group].
    Hakama M; Räsänen-Virtanen U
    Duodecim; 1975; 91(9):579-85. PubMed ID: 1175484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix].
    Berget A
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1558-9. PubMed ID: 1145871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Carcinoma of the cervix in a country district.
    Tennent RB; Tennent MS; Philip NA
    N Z Med J; 1967 Mar; 66(415):Suppl:7-13. PubMed ID: 5228790
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Present status of cytological screening for cervix neoplasms].
    Naujoks H
    Gynakologe; 1981 Dec; 14(4):204-11. PubMed ID: 6797874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Efficacy of organized screening in comparison to spontaneous Pap samples in the prevention of invasive cervical cancer].
    Kallio M; Nieminen P; Anttila A; Hakama M
    Duodecim; 2001; 117(14):1442-6. PubMed ID: 12181953
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [A mass survey of the incidence of cervix cancer].
    Thorarinsson A; Jensson O; Bjarnason O
    Nord Med; 1967 Dec; 78(49):1608-11. PubMed ID: 6073716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gynaecological mass screening in Finland.
    Timonen S
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan; 23(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 5553187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Epidemiology of cancer of the cervix uteri (author's transl)].
    Sachs H; Hasche C
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1974 Nov; 34(11):921-30. PubMed ID: 4435345
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.