BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4411522)

  • 21. [Screening for cervix uteri cancer].
    Borràs JM; Iglesias X
    Med Clin (Barc); 1994; 102 Suppl 1():80-4. PubMed ID: 8170254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Mass screening for cervix carcinoma for the time being not extended to young pregnant or non-pregnant women].
    van Veen WA
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1992 Nov; 136(47):2307-10. PubMed ID: 1461299
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Participation in highly subsidized cervical cancer screening by women in Enugu, South-east Nigeria.
    Obi SN; Ozumba BC; Nwokocha AR; Waboso PA
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Apr; 27(3):305-7. PubMed ID: 17464818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Carcinoma of the uterine cervix and mass screening].
    Timonen S; Nieminen U
    Duodecim; 1970; 86(5):277-84. PubMed ID: 5421373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Studs on population screening for early carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Bjerre B
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl; 1969; 6():1-140. PubMed ID: 5266058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Significance of systematic examinations of working women in the detection of uterine cervix cancer].
    Mekuli S; Krajinović S; Udicki S; Bosković M; Nastasović M; Ducić S; Maric R; Obradović M; Sokić S; Radovanović Z
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1969 Jun; 97(6):631-9. PubMed ID: 5198723
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the efficiency of diagnosis of early cervical carcinoma by general practitioners and cytology screening programs in the Netherlands.
    Kirk RS; Boon ME
    Acta Cytol; 1981; 25(3):259-62. PubMed ID: 6942616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Mass screening for cancer of the uterine cervix in the country of Frederiksborg. Preliminary evaluation of a centrally controlled system adapted to a selected age group].
    Larsen E; Hou-Jensen K
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1975 Jul; 137(27):1555-7. PubMed ID: 1145870
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Incidence of cervical cancer 5 years after mass screening in the community of Medvesćak].
    Juras N; Tućan V; Pirkić A; Sućur A
    Acta Med Iugosl; 1984; 38(3):197-202. PubMed ID: 6496168
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Screening for cervical cancer. Pap smears can save lives.
    Wong JG; Feussner JR
    N C Med J; 1993 Jul; 54(7):342-5. PubMed ID: 8350931
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Epidemiological aspects of detection of carcinoma of the cervix in the region of Ljubljana].
    Kovacic J; Bonta S
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Jan; 23(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 5553174
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Prophylaxis and early detection of cervix carcinoma].
    Held E
    Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax; 1970 Jul; 59(28):1021-9. PubMed ID: 5512823
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Retrospective analysis of the progress of the service for early diagnosis of tumors of the uterine cervix by means of the pap-test. Year 1977-1978].
    Marnini P; Zocchi G
    Minerva Med; 1980 May; 71(18):1293-6. PubMed ID: 7375053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [Early diagnosis of concer of the uterine cervix during prophylactic examinations under rural conditions].
    Fridman IA
    Vopr Onkol; 1969; 15(9):89-93. PubMed ID: 4242915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Detection of carcinoma of the uterine cervix in a large hospital. Organizational criteria. Preliminary results and experiences].
    Morgera P
    Minerva Ginecol; 1971 Feb; 23(3):124-32. PubMed ID: 5089724
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Vaginal cytological examination in the County of Arhus. Extent of screening in a county without a systematic screening program].
    Olesen F
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1984 Jul; 146(31):2325-9. PubMed ID: 6515834
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Prophylactic examinations for uterine cervix cancer in the female inhabitants of Bialystok District.
    Soszka S
    Pol Med J; 1970; 9(4):1019-26. PubMed ID: 5477483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Report on a three-county cervical cancer screening project.
    Whitlock NH; Long SE; Kuemmerer JM
    J S C Med Assoc; 1972 Jun; 68(6):237-46. PubMed ID: 4504050
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [A comparison between mass screening for uterine neck cancer in the Districts of Frederiksberg and Maribo].
    Koch F; Klinken L; Albrechtsen R
    Nord Med; 1971 Dec; 86(50):1534. PubMed ID: 5135061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Critique of cytology as a mass-screening method].
    Pflanz M
    Fortschr Med; 1974 Mar; 92(9):351-2 passim. PubMed ID: 4819501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.