These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4412671)

  • 21. Perstimulatory suprathreshold adaptation. 3. Sensorineural deafness.
    Kärjä J
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1974; 78(1-2):73-80. PubMed ID: 4415034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Monaural and binaural speech perception through hearing aids under noise and reverberation with normal and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nabelek AK; Pickett JM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1974 Dec; 17(4):724-39. PubMed ID: 4444292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Cochlear initiation site of the frequency-following response: a study of patients with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Yamada O; Kodera K; Hink RF; Yamane H
    Audiology; 1978; 17(6):489-99. PubMed ID: 718538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A model for the speech-reception threshold in noise without and with a hearing aid.
    Plomp R; Duquesnoy AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1982; 15():95-111. PubMed ID: 6955931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Audiologic profile of noise-induced hearing loss.
    Cooper JC; Owen JH
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Mar; 102(3):148-50. PubMed ID: 1267690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of stimulus duration and stimulus off time on the auditory and acoustic reflex thresholds.
    Feldman AS; Katz D
    J Speech Hear Res; 1978 Mar; 21(1):74-8. PubMed ID: 642490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effects of sensorineural loss on hearing speech in noise.
    Bilger RC; Stiegel MS; Stenson N
    Trans Sect Otolaryngol Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1976; 82(3 Pt 1):363-5. PubMed ID: 960409
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Increased intensity discrimination thresholds in tinnitus subjects with a normal audiogram.
    Epp B; Hots J; Verhey JL; Schaette R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):EL196-201. PubMed ID: 22979832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Can basic auditory and cognitive measures predict hearing-impaired listeners' localization and spatial speech recognition abilities?
    Neher T; Laugesen S; Jensen NS; Kragelund L
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Sep; 130(3):1542-58. PubMed ID: 21895093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Assessment of hearing aid algorithms using a master hearing aid: the influence of hearing aid experience on the relationship between speech recognition and cognitive capacity.
    Rählmann S; Meis M; Schulte M; Kießling J; Walger M; Meister H
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S105-S111. PubMed ID: 28449597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Site of lesion in cases of hearing loss associated with Rh incompatibility: an argument for peripheral impairment.
    Goldstein R; McRandle CC; Rodman LB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1972 Nov; 37(4):447-50. PubMed ID: 4675215
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Clinical manifestations of ototoxicity and noise.
    Glorig A
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 1973; 20():2-13. PubMed ID: 4710513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Remote masking, brief tone audiometry and critical ratio in sensorineural hearing losses.
    Quaranta A; Salonna I; Longo G
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1986; 25():153-8. PubMed ID: 3472319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Release from masking of low-frequency complex tones by high-frequency complex tone cue bands.
    Josupeit A; Hohmann V; van de Par S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Dec; 132(6):EL450-5. PubMed ID: 23231207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hearing aids and cochlear damage: the case against fitting the pure tone audiogram.
    Halpin C; Rauch SD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2009 May; 140(5):629-32. PubMed ID: 19393401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The effect of tone-vocoding on spatial release from masking for old, hearing-impaired listeners.
    King A; Hopkins K; Plack CJ; Pontoppidan NH; Bramsløw L; Hietkamp RK; Vatti M; Hafez A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Apr; 141(4):2591. PubMed ID: 28464637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Feasibility of acupuncture as a treatment for sensori-neural deafness in children.
    Rosen S
    Laryngoscope; 1974 Dec; 84(12):2202-17. PubMed ID: 4437258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effect of combining low- and high-frequency passbands on consonant recognition in the hearing impaired.
    Franklin B
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Dec; 18(4):719-27. PubMed ID: 1207102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Auditory threshold impairment and everyday speech reception.
    Macrae JH; Brigden DN
    Audiology; 1973; 12(4):272-90. PubMed ID: 4722026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.