67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 441381)
1. Light output and x-ray attenuation measurements at mammographic beam qualities for nine commercial intensifying screens.
Parker-Hodds S; Moores BM
Radiology; 1979 Jun; 131(3):737-42. PubMed ID: 441381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Light output and X-ray attenuation measurements for some commercial intensifying screens.
Moores BM; Walker A
Radiology; 1978 Sep; 128(3):767-74. PubMed ID: 674651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Light production from intensifying screens (theoretical and experimental aspects)].
Giacomich R; Tomasini F; Bacarini L; Di Lelio A
Radiol Med; 1982; 68(7-8):571-80. PubMed ID: 7134508
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of a compression paddle on energy response, calibration and measurement with mammographic dosimeters using ionization chambers and solid-state detectors.
Hourdakis CJ; Boziari A; Koumbouli E
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb; 54(4):1047-59. PubMed ID: 19168939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A parametric method for determining mammographic X-ray tube output and half value layer.
Robson KJ
Br J Radiol; 2001 Apr; 74(880):335-40. PubMed ID: 11387152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of mammographic x-ray spectra.
Fewell TR; Shuping RE
Radiology; 1978 Jul; 128(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 663212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mammography with synchrotron radiation: phase-detection techniques.
Arfelli F; Bonvicini V; Bravin A; Cantatore G; Castelli E; Palma LD; Michiel MD; Fabrizioli M; Longo R; Menk RH; Olivo A; Pani S; Pontoni D; Poropat P; Prest M; Rashevsky A; Ratti M; Rigon L; Tromba G; Vacchi A; Vallazza E; Zanconati F
Radiology; 2000 Apr; 215(1):286-93. PubMed ID: 10751500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
Haus AG
Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of x-ray spectra from molybdenum and tungsten target tubes on image quality in mammography.
Haus AG; Metz CE; Chiles JT; Rossmann K
Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):705-9. PubMed ID: 1251024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The relationship between the attenuation properties of breast microcalcifications and aluminum.
Zanca F; Van Ongeval C; Marshall N; Meylaers T; Michielsen K; Marchal G; Bosmans H
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Feb; 55(4):1057-68. PubMed ID: 20090185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The technical support of mammography].
Rozhkova NI; Chikirdin EG; Riudiger IuG; Kochetova GP; Lisachenko IV; Iakobs OE
Med Tekh; 2000; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Monte Carlo simulation of primary electron production inside an a-selenium detector for x-ray mammography: physics.
Sakellaris T; Spyrou G; Tzanakos G; Panayiotakis G
Phys Med Biol; 2005 Aug; 50(16):3717-38. PubMed ID: 16077223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Characteristics of x-ray intensifying screens for mammography].
Gorelik FG; Kon'kova GV
Med Tekh; 1985; (1):48-51. PubMed ID: 3974436
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
Friedrich M; Weskamp P
Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Mammography spectrum measurement using an x-ray diffraction device.
Boone JM; Yu T; Seibert A
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Sep; 43(9):2569-82. PubMed ID: 9755946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Half-value layer and intensity variations as a function of position in the radiation field for film-screen mammography.
Terry JA; Waggener RG; Miller Blough MA
Med Phys; 1999 Feb; 26(2):259-66. PubMed ID: 10076984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A model of primary and scattered photon fluence for mammographic x-ray image quantification.
Tromans CE; Cocker MR; Brady SM
Phys Med Biol; 2012 Oct; 57(20):6541-70. PubMed ID: 23010667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Optimisation of X-ray examinations in Lithuania: start of implementation in mammography.
Adliene D; Adlys G; Cerapaite R; Jonaitiene E; Cibulskaite I
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):399-402. PubMed ID: 15933145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Average glandular dose in routine mammography screening using a Sectra MicroDose Mammography unit.
Hemdal B; Herrnsdorf L; Andersson I; Bengtsson G; Heddson B; Olsson M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):436-43. PubMed ID: 15933152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. X-ray absorption, speed, and luminescent efficiency of rare earth and other intensifying screens.
Venema HW
Radiology; 1979 Mar; 130(3):765-71. PubMed ID: 424555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
