These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4415925)
1. Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment. 2. More transmitted information with sounds than lights. Lhamon WT; Goldstone S Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):295-307. PubMed ID: 4415925 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Studies of auditory-visual differences in human time judgment. 1. Sounds are judged longer than lights. Goldstone S; Lhamon WT Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Aug; 39(1):63-82. PubMed ID: 4415924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Signal pulse-rate and judged duration. Goldstone S; Lhamon WT Percept Mot Skills; 1976 Apr; 42(2):655-61. PubMed ID: 1272710 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Crossmodal interactions and multisensory integration in the perception of audio-visual motion -- a free-field study. Schmiedchen K; Freigang C; Nitsche I; Rübsamen R Brain Res; 2012 Jul; 1466():99-111. PubMed ID: 22617375 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effects of intensity and interval rhythms on the perception of auditory and visual temporal patterns. Handel S; Yoder D Q J Exp Psychol; 1975 Feb; 27(1):111-22. PubMed ID: 1114252 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Why "sounds are judged longer than lights": application of a model of the internal clock in humans. Wearden JH; Edwards H; Fakhri M; Percival A Q J Exp Psychol B; 1998 May; 51(2):97-120. PubMed ID: 9621837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effects of visual and auditory knowledge of results and reward on vigilance performance. Grunzke ME; Kirk RE; Fischer SC Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Jun; 38(3):831-6. PubMed ID: 4842439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Audiovisual temporal discrimination is less efficient with aging: an event-related potential study. Setti A; Finnigan S; Sobolewski R; McLaren L; Robertson IH; Reilly RB; Kenny RA; Newell FN Neuroreport; 2011 Aug; 22(11):554-8. PubMed ID: 21691233 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination. Fujisaki W; Nishida S Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Attention and processing capacity in auditory recognition. Moore JJ; Massaro DW J Exp Psychol; 1973 Jun; 99(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 4714081 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Differences in the neural basis of automatic auditory and visual time perception: ERP evidence from an across-modal delayed response oddball task. Chen Y; Huang X; Luo Y; Peng C; Liu C Brain Res; 2010 Apr; 1325():100-11. PubMed ID: 20170647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Expected value as a determinant of the distribution of attention. Shulman HG; Fisher RP J Exp Psychol; 1972 May; 93(2):343-8. PubMed ID: 5025739 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Crossmodal facilitation of masked visual target discrimination by informative auditory cuing. Ngo MK; Spence C Neurosci Lett; 2010 Jul; 479(2):102-6. PubMed ID: 20580658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Auditory and visual differences in time perception? An investigation from a developmental perspective with neuropsychological tests. Zélanti PS; Droit-Volet S J Exp Child Psychol; 2012 Jul; 112(3):296-311. PubMed ID: 22621934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sensory and association cortex in time perception. Bueti D; Bahrami B; Walsh V J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Jun; 20(6):1054-62. PubMed ID: 18211231 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Meaningful auditory information enhances perception of visual biological motion. Arrighi R; Marini F; Burr D J Vis; 2009 Apr; 9(4):25.1-7. PubMed ID: 19757934 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]