BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4418676)

  • 1. Effects of cue-reward congruity on retardates' learning under varying conditions of S-R contiguity.
    Wunderlich RA
    Psychol Rep; 1974 Aug; 35(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 4418676
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Titration and double responding as techniques promoting proficient learning in retardates.
    Wunderlich RA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1971 Dec; 12(3):279-88. PubMed ID: 5001617
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Verbal control and intradimensional transfer of discrimination learning in mentally retarded vs. intellectually average subjects.
    Lobb H; Childs R
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Sep; 78(2):182-92. PubMed ID: 4769571
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stimulus-presentation methods and ability to shift dimensions in color-form preference of retardates.
    Goesling WJ
    Percept Mot Skills; 1973 Jun; 36(3):807-10. PubMed ID: 4704328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cue distinctiveness, learning, and transfer in mentally retarded persons.
    Switzky HN
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Nov; 78(3):277-85. PubMed ID: 4769170
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of S-R discontiguity and double responding on two-odd oddity learning by retardates.
    Wunderlich RA
    Psychol Rep; 1974 Dec; 35(3):1327-31. PubMed ID: 4445443
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Incidental learning and short-range memory in normals and retardates.
    Deich RF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1974 Apr; 38(2):539-42. PubMed ID: 4824088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single alternation discrimination learning in retarded adolescents as a function of within-trials variability.
    Clinton L; Evans RA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1972 Jan; 76(4):434-9. PubMed ID: 5060205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal and contextual cues as discriminative attributes in retardates' recognition memory.
    Brown AL
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 4704210
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of secondary cues on rote verbal learning of retardates and normal children.
    Baumeister AA; Berry FM; Forehand R
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1969 Oct; 69(2):273-80. PubMed ID: 5404458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Operant conditioning of mental retardates' visual monitoring.
    Perryman RE; Halcomb CR; Landers WF
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Oct; 53(2):507-12. PubMed ID: 7312537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Problem length and multiple discrimination learning in retarded children.
    House BJ
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Nov; 78(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 4769166
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Delayed response performance of mentally retarded patients.
    Isaacson RL; Perkins MA
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 May; 77(6):737-47. PubMed ID: 4726477
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discrimination learning of retarded children as a function of positive reinforcement and response cost.
    Harris LM; Tramontana J
    Am J Ment Defic; 1973 Sep; 78(2):216-9. PubMed ID: 4769574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Rehearsal capacity and dimensional independence in retardates.
    McBane BM
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1976 Oct; 22(2):216-28. PubMed ID: 993709
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Paired-associate learning by normal children and retardates with relevant redundant compound stimuli.
    Berry FM; Baumeister AA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1973 Feb; 15(1):63-76. PubMed ID: 4706965
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of a discriminative cue and an incompatible activity on generalized imitation.
    Bucher B; Bowman EA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1974 Aug; 18(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 4459436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cue salience and learning in severely sub-normal children. Effects of varying the attention value of the cues employed in a one-trial learning situation.
    Sinson J; Wetherick NE
    J Ment Defic Res; 1972 Jun; 16(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 4277423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison for mental retardates of no-choice, initial-choice, and idiosyncratic-choice reward strategies.
    Alexander DD
    Psychol Rep; 1974 Aug; 35(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 4417849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Stimulus selection by the retarded: list length and response requirement.
    Berry F; Baumeister AA; Duncan EM
    Am J Psychol; 1975 Mar; 88(1):77-86. PubMed ID: 1236564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.