These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4422219)
1. Brain damage to infant--caused by water intoxication or the improper administration of anesthesia--malpractice? Direct examination of plaintiff's medical expert. Part I. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; Annual(0):303-44. PubMed ID: 4422219 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Brain damage to infant--caused by water intoxication or the improper administration of anesthesia--malpractice? Direct and cross-examinations of defendant hospital's medical expert--part III. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; 21(1):89-120. PubMed ID: 4422218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Brain damage to infant--caused by water intoxication or the improper administration of anesthesia--malpractice? II. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; 20(4):431-72. PubMed ID: 4839868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Brain damage to infant--caused by water intoxication or the improper administration of anesthesia--malpractice? Part II. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; Annual(0):431-72. PubMed ID: 4422220 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Medical malpractice: plaintiff's counsel speaks. Rozovsky LE Dimens Health Serv; 1974 Jan; 51(1):29-30. PubMed ID: 4154228 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Mistaking identity: medical errors, physicians, and plaintiff's attorneys. Bosk CL Trans Stud Coll Physicians Phila; 1991 Sep; 13(3):249-61. PubMed ID: 1957343 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medical testimony in a cerebral concussion case, detailing the otological and otoneurological examination and tests, and showing the direct and cross-examination of the plaintiff's otolaryngologist. Med Trial Tech Q; 1967 Sep; 14(1):99-114. PubMed ID: 6062505 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical testimony in a diverticulitis of the colon with surgical management case, showing the direct and cross-examination of the defendant surgeon by the plaintiff's and the defendant's lawyers. Med Trial Tech Q; 1967 Dec; 14(2):73-97 contd. PubMed ID: 6083043 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Malpractice against psychologist, pediatrician and neurologist--dystonia musculorum deformans--direct and cross-examination of plaintiff's expert (a neurosurgeon)--part I. Med Trial Tech Q; 1977; 24(1):83-120. PubMed ID: 916869 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical testimony in a nasal polyp operation and meningitis case, showing the direct examination of the defendant's otolaryngologist by the plaintiff's lawyer. Med Trial Tech Q; 1966 Mar; 12(3):71-118 contd. PubMed ID: 5907890 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Medical malpractice case--laceration of carotid artery--discovery deposition of plaintiff's medical witness--general practitioner. Munday J Med Trial Tech Q; 1979; 26(2):218-48. PubMed ID: 545067 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Trial technique. Medical testimony on informed consent and expressed warranty, in a case of TUR (transurethral prostatic resection) with urinary incontinence following, showing the direct and cross-examinations of the defendant urologist, plaintiff's internist, general practitioner, physiatrist, and urologist, and the defendant's urologist, including charge to the jury. Med Trial Tech Q; 1969 Sep; 16(1):69-120. PubMed ID: 5343511 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Medical testimony in a trauma-diabetes case, showing the direct and cross-examinations of the plaintiff's pediatrician and expert witness (an internist). Part I. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; Annual(0):99-120. PubMed ID: 4418250 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Medical testimony in a trauma-diabetes case, showing the direct and cross-examinations of the plaintiff's pediatrician and expert witness (an internist). Part II. Med Trial Tech Q; 1974; Annual(0):191-216. PubMed ID: 4418251 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Medical testimony in a major abdominal trauma case of liver laceration with partial hepatectomy, showing the direct and cross-examination of the plaintiff's surgeon. Med Trial Tech Q; 1967 Sep; 14(1):79-98. PubMed ID: 6062504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [What should we do and what should we not do after an anaesthetic accident. The point of view of a medical expert]. Murat I Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2012 Jan; 31(1):e47-8. PubMed ID: 22138263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Re: Ethics of serving as a plaintiff's expert medical witness. Reed DN; Gauvin JM Surgery; 2005 Jun; 137(6):667; author reply 667-9. PubMed ID: 15933642 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Medical testimony in a nasal polyp operation and meningitis case, showing the direct examination of the defendant otolaryngologist by the plaintiff's lawyer. Med Trial Tech Q; 1966 Jun; 12(4):65-111 concl. PubMed ID: 5965462 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Tracheotomy and dilatation of the stenosis as alternative methods of treatment]. Wienke A Laryngorhinootologie; 1992 Aug; 71(8):429-31. PubMed ID: 1388470 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]