These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4423064)

  • 21. [Lakartidningen's scrutiny routines--equal to the heavies. The peer review system and the expert editorial staff guarantee scientific quality].
    Milerad J; Ahlberg J; Bågedahl-Strindlund M; Eliasson M; Fridén B; Håkansson A; Sundberg CJ; Ostergren J
    Lakartidningen; 2003 Nov; 100(48):3934-6. PubMed ID: 14717088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Tidsskriftet, peer review and medical publishing].
    Bjørheim J; Frich JC; Gjersvik P; Jacobsen G; Swensen E
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2006 Jan; 126(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 16397649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Conflicts of interest and disclosures in publications.
    Camilleri M; Dubnansky EC; Rustgi AK
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2007 Mar; 5(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 17368225
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Lack of biological expertise in certain medical publications].
    Watine J; Hacini J; Brevet E
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1998; 56(2):228-9. PubMed ID: 9754254
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Peer review].
    Boer EJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 1989 Dec; 133(49):2455-9. PubMed ID: 2594115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A comparison of reviewers selected by editors and reviewers suggested by authors.
    Rivara FP; Cummings P; Ringold S; Bergman AB; Joffe A; Christakis DA
    J Pediatr; 2007 Aug; 151(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 17643779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Revealing the faults in medical journals.
    Liesegang TJ
    Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2009; 57(2):75-83. PubMed ID: 19333735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. International Journal of Legal Medicine's manuscript submission and peer-review system goes electronic!
    Brinkmann B; Pfeiffer H
    Int J Legal Med; 2009 May; 123(3):187. PubMed ID: 19347347
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparison of reports from referees chosen by authors or journal editors in the peer review process.
    Earnshaw JJ; Farndon JR; Guillou PJ; Johnson CD; Murie JA; Murray GD
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2000 Apr; 82(4 Suppl):133-5. PubMed ID: 10889776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Peer review: an experiment.
    Harnad S
    Science; 1980 May; 208(4447):974, 976. PubMed ID: 7375919
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Magnanimity.
    Freeman MP; Gelenberg AJ
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2013 Jan; 74(1):6-9. PubMed ID: 23419221
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Peer review and medical journals: how to make a good thing better.
    Fletcher SW; Fletcher RH
    Natl Med J India; 1994; 7(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 8069197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Additional statements from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
    CMAJ; 1995 May; 152(10):1647-55. PubMed ID: 7743450
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cancer fraud case stuns research community, prompts reflection on peer review process.
    Vastag B
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Mar; 98(6):374-6. PubMed ID: 16537825
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Editorial peer review in medicine.
    Lock S
    Recenti Prog Med; 1991 Jan; 82(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 2028075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. How do we ensure 'high quality' clinical research?
    Creinin MD; Shields W
    Contraception; 2005 Aug; 72(2):83-4. PubMed ID: 16022844
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Views of Iranian medical journal editors on medical research publication.
    Etemadi A; Raiszadeh F; Alaeddini F; Azizi F
    Saudi Med J; 2004 Jan; 25(1 Suppl):S29-33. PubMed ID: 14968189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The art and science of reviewing manuscripts for orthopaedic journals: Part II. Optimizing the manuscript: practical hints for improving the quality of reviews.
    Levine AM; Heckman JD; Hensinger RN
    Instr Course Lect; 2004; 53():689-97. PubMed ID: 15116659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Writing a literature review article.
    Aaron L
    Radiol Technol; 2008; 80(2):185-6. PubMed ID: 19005101
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A look inside the Pharos review process.
    Harris ED
    Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 2003; 66(2):36-7. PubMed ID: 12838637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.