These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4425718)

  • 1. Differential conditioning of electrodermal responses: effects of performing a masking task during the interstimulus and intertrial intervals.
    Wilson RA; Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE
    Biol Psychol; 1974; 2(1):33-46. PubMed ID: 4425718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction probability as a determiner of anticipatory and preparatory electrodermal behavior.
    Grings WW; Sukoneck HI
    J Exp Psychol; 1971 Dec; 91(2):310-7. PubMed ID: 5134675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Differential GSR conditioning accompanied by a two-light prediction task.
    Hunt DP; Daily RF
    J Gen Psychol; 1974 Apr; 90(2d Half):165-77. PubMed ID: 4833495
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of two methods for producing response inhibition in electrodermal conditioning.
    Grings WW; Carey CA; Schell AM
    J Exp Psychol; 1974 Oct; 103(4):658-62. PubMed ID: 4448964
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Concurrent measurement of awareness and electrodermal classical conditioning.
    Dawson ME; Biferno MA
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Nov; 101(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 4759641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Latency of multiple skin conductance responses in differential classical conditioning.
    Kotses H; Glaus KD
    Biol Psychol; 1977 Mar; 5(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 861322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrodermal responses and subjective estimates of UCS probability in a long interstimulus interval conditioning paradigm.
    Ohman A; Ellström PE; Björkstrand PA
    Psychophysiology; 1976 Mar; 13(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 1257373
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Orienting reactions, expectancy learning, and conditioned responses in electrodermal conditioning with different interstimulus intervals.
    Ohman A
    Biol Psychol; 1974; 1(3):189-200. PubMed ID: 4414947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cognitive processes in differential GSR conditioning: effects of a masking task.
    Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE
    Am J Psychol; 1969 Jun; 82(2):168-80. PubMed ID: 5811180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Unexpected effects of masking: differential EDR conditioning without relational learning.
    Baer PE; Fuhrer MJ
    Psychophysiology; 1973 Jan; 10(1):95-9. PubMed ID: 4684240
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of explicit trial-by-trial information about shock probability in long interstimulus interval GSR conditioning.
    Ohman A; Björkstrand PA; Ellström PE
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Apr; 98(1):145-51. PubMed ID: 4704205
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Latent inhibition in the conditioned electrodermal response.
    Surwit RS; Poser EG
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1974 Mar; 86(3):543-8. PubMed ID: 4814770
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interaction between intelligence level and interstimulus trace interval in electrodermal conditioning.
    Lobb H; Nugent CM
    Am J Ment Defic; 1966 Jan; 70(4):548-55. PubMed ID: 5909437
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Orienting responses and personality variables as predictors of differential conditioning of electrodermal responses and awareness of stimulus relations.
    Fuhrer MJ; Baer PE; Cowan CO
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1973 Aug; 27(2):287-96. PubMed ID: 4723975
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Habituation of the electrodermal orienting reaction to potentially phobic and supposedly neutral stimuli in normal human subjects.
    Ohman A; Eriksson A; Fredriksson M; Hugdahl K; Olofsson C
    Biol Psychol; 1974; 2(2):85-93. PubMed ID: 4475600
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cognitive factors in electrodermal conditioning.
    Grings WW
    Psychol Bull; 1973 Mar; 79(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 4570402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. On the automatic nature of phobic fear: conditioned electrodermal responses to masked fear-relevant stimuli.
    Ohman A; Soares JJ
    J Abnorm Psychol; 1993 Feb; 102(1):121-32. PubMed ID: 8436688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. When orienting and anticipation dissociate--a case for scoring electrodermal responses in multiple latency windows in studies of human fear conditioning.
    Luck CC; Lipp OV
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2016 Feb; 100():36-43. PubMed ID: 26688271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Partial reinforcement effects in classical aversive conditioning in rabbits and human beings.
    Leonard DW
    J Comp Physiol Psychol; 1975 Feb; 88(2):596-608. PubMed ID: 1150940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electrodermal responses as affected by subject- versus experimenter-controlled noxious stimulation.
    Björkstrand PA
    J Exp Psychol; 1973 Mar; 97(3):365-9. PubMed ID: 4705243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.