114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4426233)
1. [Abortion under ethical indication].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Oct; 99(42):2126. PubMed ID: 4426233
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. [ON THE PROBLEM OF THE ETHICAL INDICATION].
BECKER W
Med Klin; 1963 Nov; 58():1857-9. PubMed ID: 14100264
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. [Compensation for damages due to failure to interrupt pregnancy. Prenatal indication according to Section 218a, Paragraph 2. No. 1 of the Federal Criminal Law--2 verdicts passed by the Federal Court].
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Feb; 126(6):128-31. PubMed ID: 6423985
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Pregnancy interruption and euthanasia].
Ehrhardt HE
Arch Kriminol; 1973; 152(5):129-45. PubMed ID: 4588097
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [Legal reforms on pregnancy interruption].
Eser A
Med Welt; 1971 Apr; 17():721-9. PubMed ID: 5555294
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Fetal indication for the termination of pregnancy from an ethical viewpoint].
Auer A
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1983 Jan; 43(1):51-6. PubMed ID: 6550547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [The ethical challenge. Is the physician allowed to do what he must do?].
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1984 Feb; 126(6):132-6. PubMed ID: 6423987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. [Ethical problems in fertility medicine].
Herms E
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1988 Apr; 48(4):273-8. PubMed ID: 3378695
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Abortion from the ethical point of view].
Vossenkuhl W
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1981 Feb; 123(6):198-200. PubMed ID: 6782462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [First analysis of the abortion statistics].
Huschenbeth I
Bundesgesundheitsblatt; 1978 Feb; 21(3):41-4. PubMed ID: 12336456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Proposal for the management of the current regulations under Paragraph 218].
Stoll P; Sievers S
Fortschr Med; 1976 Sep; 94(27):1468-71. PubMed ID: 971894
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. [Interruption of pregnancy--for and against].
Lochmüller H
Munch Med Wochenschr; 1972 Sep; 114(37):1557-60. PubMed ID: 4678035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Letter: Contemporary legal standpoint on induced abortion].
Rieger HJ
Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Sep; 99(37):1837-8. PubMed ID: 4457309
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Medical intervention from the viewpoint of criminal law].
Noll P
Dtsch Z Gesamte Gerichtl Med; 1966; 57(1):12-25. PubMed ID: 5987902
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. State legislation can lessen impact of Court's abortion decision.
Stratton RW
Hosp Prog; 1973 Oct; 54(10):8-9. PubMed ID: 4746788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Attempt at handling the new legal regulation to paragraph 218].
Stoll P; Sievers S
Fortschr Med; 1976 Nov; 94(33):1893-4. PubMed ID: 992552
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [The fetus, under criminal law is considered a complete human being from the onset of labor pains].
Fortschr Med; 1984 Mar; 102(10):92. PubMed ID: 6714897
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. [Procedures in the termination of pregnancy, "Mannheim" proposal - document symbol Paragraph 218/new 76].
Sievers S; Höhn N
Fortschr Med; 1976 Sep; 94(27):1471-2. PubMed ID: 971895
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Notes on the article by W. Spann: "Special Problems of Sterilization for Social Indication and Sterilization as Favor"].
Kepp R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1976 Sep; 36(9):795-6. PubMed ID: 976727
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. ["That depends on the situation!" Sense and limits of an oft-heard remark].
Piechowiak H
MMW Munch Med Wochenschr; 1981 Jun; 123(23):962-4. PubMed ID: 6789157
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
