These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Disparities in mentally retarded persons' IQs derived from different intelligence tests. Spitz HH Am J Ment Defic; 1986 Mar; 90(5):588-91. PubMed ID: 3953693 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intellectual evaluations of children using human figure drawings: an empirical investigation of two methods. Abell SC; von Briesen PD; Watz LS J Clin Psychol; 1996 Jan; 52(1):67-74. PubMed ID: 8682914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relationships between scores on Stanford-Binet IV and Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Carvajal H; Weyand K Psychol Rep; 1986 Oct; 59(2 Pt 2):963-6. PubMed ID: 3809352 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the Leiter International Performance Scale-Revised and the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition, in children with autism spectrum disorders. Grondhuis SN; Mulick JA Am J Intellect Dev Disabil; 2013 Jan; 118(1):44-54. PubMed ID: 23301902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships between scores on Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence--Revised and Stanford-Binet IV. Carvajal HH; Parks JP; Bays KJ; Logan RA; Lujano CI; Page GL; Weaver KA Psychol Rep; 1991 Aug; 69(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 1961799 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Concurrent validity study of the Slosson Intelligence Test-Revised in mental retardation testing. Kunen S; Overstreet S; Salles C Ment Retard; 1996 Dec; 34(6):380-6. PubMed ID: 8990822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale. Atkinson L Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability. Bloom AS; Allard AM; Zelko FA; Brill WJ; Topinka CW; Pfohl W Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The construct validity of the stanford-binet 5 measures of working memory. Pomplun M; Custer M Assessment; 2005 Sep; 12(3):338-46. PubMed ID: 16123254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Correlations between scores on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-III and the General Purpose Abbreviated Battery of the Stanford-Binet IV. Carvajal HH; Hayes JE; Lackey KL; Rathke ML; Wiebe DA; Weaver KA Psychol Rep; 1993 Jun; 72(3 Pt 2):1167-70. PubMed ID: 8337322 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Ratio developmental quotients from the Bayley are comparable to later IQs from the Stanford-Binet. Goldstein DJ; Sheaffer CI Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Jan; 92(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 3342140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting the handicapped infants in Hong Kong. Baber FM Mod Med Asia; 1977 Nov; 13(11):11-5. PubMed ID: 74796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. External validity of the profile variability index for the K-ABC, Stanford-Binet, and WISC-R: another cul de-sac. Kline RB; Snyder J; Guilmette S; Castellanos M J Learn Disabil; 1993 Oct; 26(8):557-67. PubMed ID: 8245701 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term validity of the Slosson Intelligence Test. Stewart KD; Myers DG J Clin Psychol; 1974 Apr; 30(2):180-1. PubMed ID: 4823223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Construct validity of the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children with mildly mentally retarded students. Obrzut A; Nelson RB; Obrzut JE Am J Ment Defic; 1987 Jul; 92(1):74-7. PubMed ID: 3618659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Uses of Rasch scaling in the measurement of cognitive development and growth. Roid GH; Woodcock RW J Outcome Meas; 2000; 4(2):579-94. PubMed ID: 11272618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Performance of Down syndrome individuals on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Silverstein AB; Legutki G; Friedman SL; Takayama DL Am J Ment Defic; 1982 Mar; 86(5):548-51. PubMed ID: 6214950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Difficulties in comparing outcomes of low-birthweight studies because of obsolescent test norms. Bill JM; Sykes DH; Hoy EA Dev Med Child Neurol; 1986 Apr; 28(2):244-7. PubMed ID: 3709994 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]