These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. [Reflection of the periodic structure of complex acoustic signals in the summated activity of inferior colliculus neurons in cats]. Radionova EA Fiziol Zh SSSR Im I M Sechenova; 1981 Nov; 67(11):1628-35. PubMed ID: 7327274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of reverberation and filtering on speech rate judgment. Moore RE; Adams EM; Dagenais PA; Caffee C Int J Audiol; 2007 Mar; 46(3):154-60. PubMed ID: 17365069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. On the robustness of overall F0-only modifications to the perception of emotions in speech. Bulut M; Narayanan S J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):4547-58. PubMed ID: 18537403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perceptual organization of tone sequences in the auditory cortex of awake macaques. Micheyl C; Tian B; Carlyon RP; Rauschecker JP Neuron; 2005 Oct; 48(1):139-48. PubMed ID: 16202714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Distinct fMRI responses to laughter, speech, and sounds along the human peri-sylvian cortex. Meyer M; Zysset S; von Cramon DY; Alter K Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jul; 24(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 15993767 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. [Studies on the Lombard effect]. Schlöndorff G; Tegtmeier W; Ilstad B Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1971 Mar; 50(3):158-61. PubMed ID: 5125579 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Backward and forward masking between two speech-like sounds. Budohoska W; Szymański L Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1974; 34(6):723-36. PubMed ID: 4455042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. [The difference of spectral composition of a sound stimulus and the velocity of its movement in the vertical plane]. Agaeva MIu; Nikitin NI Fiziol Cheloveka; 2003; 29(3):16-21. PubMed ID: 12845777 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Judgments and dimension analyses of perceived sound quality of sound-reproducing systems. Gabrielsson A; Rosenberg U; Sjögren H J Acoust Soc Am; 1974 Apr; 55(4):854-61. PubMed ID: 4833083 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Selectivity for distortions and words in speech perception. Haggard M Br J Psychol; 1974 Feb; 65(1):69-83. PubMed ID: 4822773 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. The limiting effect of discard interval on time-compressed speech. Gerber SE; Wulfeck BB Lang Speech; 1977; 20(2):108-15. PubMed ID: 611346 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Auditory streaming: competition among alternative organizations. Bregman AS Percept Psychophys; 1978 May; 23(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 683823 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Perceptions of personality from speech: effects of manipulations of acoustical parameters. Brown BL; Strong WJ; Rencher AC J Acoust Soc Am; 1973 Jul; 54(1):29-35. PubMed ID: 4731646 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Is the effort dependence of speech loudness explicable on the basis of acoustical cues? Glave RD; Rietveld AC J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Oct; 58(4):875-9. PubMed ID: 1194546 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. On the front cavity resonance and its possible role in speech perception. Kuhn GM J Acoust Soc Am; 1975 Aug; 58(2):428-33. PubMed ID: 1184836 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]