218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4441729)
1. Considerations in the protection of humans as subjects of research.
Chalkley DT
Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1974; 8(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 4441729
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Human experimentation: the review process in practice.
Cowan DH
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):533-64. PubMed ID: 11661165
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The regulation of human experimentation in the United States--a personal odyssey.
Katz J
IRB; 1987; 9(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 11649890
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Who shall decide when doctors disagree? A review of the legal development of informed consent and the implications of proposed lay review of human experimentation.
Ratnoff MF
Case West Reserve Law Rev; 1975; 25(3):472-532. PubMed ID: 11661164
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. An act...to establish a program of National Research Service Awards...and to provide for the protection of human subjects involved in biomedical and behavioral research.... Approved 12 Jul 1974.
U.S
US Statut Large; 1974; 88 342-354():2-354. PubMed ID: 12085916
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. IRBs and pharmaceutical company funding of research.
Jellinek MS; Levine RJ
IRB; 1982 Oct; 4(8):9-10. PubMed ID: 11651693
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Institutional review boards in the university setting: review of pharmaceutical testing protocols, informed consent and ethical concerns.
Kobasic DM
J Coll Univ Law; 1988; 15(2):185-216. PubMed ID: 11659168
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Bill of rights for research subjects.
Prentice ED; Reitemeier PJ; Antonson DL; Kelso TK; Jameton A
IRB; 1993; 15(2):7-9. PubMed ID: 11651568
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Protection of human subjects.
United States
Code Fed Regul Shipping; 1982 Oct; Part 46, Sections 46.101 to 46.306():. PubMed ID: 11660819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The concept of the IRB and bureaucratic reality: an exchange of letters.
van Eys J; Levine RJ
IRB; 1984; 6(4):8-10. PubMed ID: 11649563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Guidelines for confidentiality in research on AIDS.
Bayer R; Levine C; Murray TH
IRB; 1984; 6(6):1-7. PubMed ID: 11649192
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Institutional review boards and public health research: an analysis.
Hogue LL
Univ Ark Little Rock Law J; 1978; 1(2):428-54. PubMed ID: 11661619
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Using the brain dead for medical research.
Martyn SR
Utah Law Rev; 1986; 1986(1):1-28. PubMed ID: 11651917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Special informed consent requirements are included in protocol review procedures.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1-2. PubMed ID: 11654274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Informed consent process is deemed "legally and ethically invalid" by witness.
Maloney DM
Hum Res Rep; 1995 Jan; 10(1):4-5. PubMed ID: 11660008
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. HEW proposed policy on the protection of human subjects: experimentation and the institutionalized mentally disabled.
Wash Univ Law Q; 1975; 1975(3):745-74. PubMed ID: 11662989
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The noninstitutional review board: a case history.
Herman SS
IRB; 1984; 6(1):1-3, 12. PubMed ID: 11649540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Obtaining "informed consent": controversy over radiation tests focuses attention on rules for human subjects.
Wheeler DL
Chron High Educ; 1994 Jan; 40():8-9, 16. PubMed ID: 11658067
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter trials and subject eligibility: should local IRBs play a role?
Freedman B
IRB; 1994; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 11652320
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Protecting research subjects after consent: the case for the "research intermediary.
Reiser SJ; Knudson P
IRB; 1993; 15(2):10-1. PubMed ID: 11651567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
