These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4442565)
21. When can you treat minors without parental consent? Rosenberg CL Med Econ; 1973 Jul; 50(14):77-82. PubMed ID: 11664357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Law of 30 Aug 1996 amending the law on family planning, protection of human fetuses, and the conditions under which pregnancy termination is permissable, and amending other laws. (Dziennik Ustaw Rzeczypospolitej, 4 Dec 1996, No. 139, Text No. 646, pp. 2885-2888). Poland Int Dig Health Legis; 1997; 48(2):176-8. PubMed ID: 11656778 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Consent and medical treatment of minors. Blumberg ML N Y State J Med; 1979 Jun; 79(7):998. PubMed ID: 11643534 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Pregnancy, teenagers and the law, 1974. Paul EW; Pilpel HF; Wechsler NF Fam Plann Perspect; 1974; 6(3):142-7. PubMed ID: 4480441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Roe to Casey: a survey of abortion law. Pirner RK; Williams LB Washburn Law J; 1993; 32(2):166-89. PubMed ID: 11659798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The abortion cases. Rust ME ABA J; 1986 Feb; 72():50-3. PubMed ID: 11655726 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. The availability of abortion, sterilization, and other medical treatment for minor patients. Dunn LJ UMKC Law Rev; 1975; 44(1):1-22. PubMed ID: 11664542 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Consent to medical care of minors: who has authority in Texas? Farrell HC Texas Bar J; 1979 Jan; 42(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 11664115 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Constitutional law--a state may constitutionally regulate the abortion decision during the first trimester of pregnancy if it can show that the regulation is necessary to protect a compelling state interest. Wodtke AK Drake Law Rev; 1976; 26(3):716-27. PubMed ID: 11664788 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Resolving the abortion debate: compromise legislation, an analysis of the abortion policies of the United States, France and Germany. Hertberg BL Suffolk Transnatl Law R; 1993; 16(2):513-70. PubMed ID: 11659765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Parent versus child: H.L. v. Matheson and the new abortion litigation. Bridge B Wis L Rev; 1982; 1982(1):75-116. PubMed ID: 11655605 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Abortion choice and the law in Vermont: a recent study. Olmstead FH Vt Law Rev; 1982; 7(2):281-313. PubMed ID: 11655820 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Teens left with many options despite 'squeal rule'. Ob Gyn News; 1983 Jul 1-14; 18(13):36. PubMed ID: 11658369 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Minors, ObGyn practice and the law. Jasinski DR Hawaii Med J; 1972; 31(2):116. PubMed ID: 5067728 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Abortion regulation: the circumscription of state intervention by the doctrine of informed consent. Abbot L Georgia Law Rev; 1981; 15(3):681-713. PubMed ID: 11658321 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Minors; contracts not disaffirmable; pregnancy care. California Wests Annot Calif Codes Calif; 1982; Section 34.5 as amended 1975():. PubMed ID: 12041478 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Constitutional law--right to privacy--municipal roadblock to abortion denounced--City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health, Inc., 103 S.Ct. 2481(1983). Crusius CJ Seton Hall Law Rev; 1984; 14(3):658-82. PubMed ID: 11658811 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Your parents or the judge: Massachusetts' new abortion consent law. Donovan P Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(5):224-8. PubMed ID: 7286173 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Therapeutic abortion and the minor. Gibbs RF J Leg Med (N Y); 1973; 1(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 4548071 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]