These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4442570)
1. Ethnic group and welfare status of women sterilized in federally funded family planning programs, 1972. Vaughan D; Sparer G Fam Plann Perspect; 1974; 6(4):224-9. PubMed ID: 4442570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A survey of China's birth control among women of child-bearing age. Qiu S China Popul Newsl; 1983 Dec; 1(2):8-12, 17. PubMed ID: 12312960 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effect of family planning in Georgia on fertility in selected rural counties. Rochat RW; Tyler CW; Schoenbucher AK Int Congr Ser; 1971; 224():6-14. PubMed ID: 12332715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Access to postpartum sterilization in southeast Brazil. Janowitz B; Higgins JE; Clopton DC; Nakamura MS; Brown ML Med Care; 1982 May; 20(5):526-34. PubMed ID: 7098591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Social policy and out-of-wedlock births to adolescents. Ozawa MN Adv Adolesc Mental Health; 1990; 4():281-99. PubMed ID: 12317630 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sterilization and "de facto" sterilization. Ross L Amic J; 1994; ():29. PubMed ID: 12287353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do fertility intentions and behaviour influence sterilization in Sri Lanka? De Silva WI Asia Pac Popul J; 1992 Dec; 7(4):41-60. PubMed ID: 12317940 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of national health programs. IV. Louisiana family planning. Beasley JD; Frankowski RF; Hawkins CM Am J Public Health; 1971 Sep; 61(9):1812-25. PubMed ID: 5565447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Understanding U.S. fertility: findings from the National Survey of Family Growth, Cycle III. Pratt WF; Mosher WD; Bachrach CA; Horn MC Popul Bull; 1984 Dec; 39(5):3-42. PubMed ID: 12266654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation removes obstacles to sterilization in Brazil. Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1985; 5(1):6-7. PubMed ID: 12314001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Estimating family planning program effects on U.S. fertility rates. Cutright P; Jaffe FS Eval Q; 1977 Aug; 1(3):381-98. PubMed ID: 12261453 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Contraceptive failure in the United States: the impact of social economic and demographic factors (author's transl)]. Schirm AL; Trussell J; Menken J; Grady WR Contracept Fertil Sex (Paris); 1983 Apr; 11(4):659-73. PubMed ID: 12338614 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of family planning participation on prenatal care use and low birth weight. Jamieson DJ; Buescher PA Fam Plann Perspect; 1992; 24(5):214-8. PubMed ID: 1426183 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Poverty in America: trends and new patterns. O'hare WP Popul Bull; 1985 Jun; 40(3):1-44. PubMed ID: 12340180 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The state of organized family planning programs in the United States, 1973. Corey M Fam Plann Perspect; 1974; 6(1):15-26. PubMed ID: 4617687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical and contraceptive reasons for sterilization in the United States. Rindfuss RR; Liao F Stud Fam Plann; 1988; 19(6 Pt 1):370-80. PubMed ID: 3232166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Recent changes in contraceptive use and fertility in Korea]. Cho NH; Kong SK; Lim JK Ingu Pogon Nonjip; 1984 Dec; 4(2):3-27. PubMed ID: 12313503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Trends in contraceptive use in the United States: 1982-1995. Piccinino LJ; Mosher WD Fam Plann Perspect; 1998; 30(1):4-10, 46. PubMed ID: 9494809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding U.S. fertility: continuity and change in the National Survey of Family Growth, 1988-1995. Mosher WD; Bachrach CA Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 8822409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]